Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
POG Politics Thread Version 3 POG Politics Thread Version 3

09-18-2020 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
If I unlock the thread will you go find his worse posts for me?
Because I saw one post that seemed questionable both perhaps factually and due to a lack of sensitivity it displayed. Beyond that I need to know what actually was so offensive-- asking people to quote J.K Rowling and talking about gametes and elephants?
this is a strawman

literally no one is saying the content of individual posts was bannable
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
this is a strawman



literally no one is saying the content of individual posts was bannable
Lol. Ok. Great. As long as we have that cleared up.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:45 PM
So when do VMF and CN get banned?
(Sorry but don't worry I'm coming with you)
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
Am I missing something? Didn't EB just make sure that a permanently banned poster could not post anymore? This seems administrative to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
EB doesn't have that authority. He was put in place to be a mod for one thread, not to moderate the forum or 2p2 as a whole.
Kelhus had thousands of posts in the politics main forum without being banned. And WN had no problems banning actual problematic posters, and Kelhus was still active in politics.
Why not ban Crossnerd and VMF again if this is the standard?
I just have a simple question. Was the poster using the handle Kelhus a permanently banned poster or not?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
I just have a simple question. Was the poster using the handle Kelhus a permanently banned poster or not?
yes, and there are others here
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
I just have a simple question. Was the poster using the handle Kelhus a permanently banned poster or not?
So are CN and VMF, yes.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:47 PM
luckbox, if kelhus stayed here, the politics thread would have just been you and him

everyone else would have abandoned it

so get his phone number or start a discord chat with him
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
luckbox, if kelhus stayed here, the politics thread would have just been you and him

everyone else would have abandoned it

so get his phone number or start a discord chat with him
Then we would deal with that if it happened.
There are people who already don't post because of me as is. And good riddance to them.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
But you don't get to just be like "ahh someone was banned so sad. But they weren't marginalized enough to care about".
Are you telling me I don’t get to have an opinion? That seems... ironic.. I’m not sad he got banned, I’m sad we’re losing a ww player over this, possibly two if you keep this up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
I actually liked Kelhus and like I said interacted with him fairly extensively over the last year or so in the politics forum. So when people who should never have been mod ban him unjustly I'm obviously going to be upset, especially when it takes place in my thread and involves Kelhus discussing elephants.
Ultimately no I'm not going too far.
Sorry I forgot, you liking someone means there are actual stakes here that anyone should care about. Someone LB likes got a ban, stop the presses this is some important ****ing **** right here!
No one is telling you that you can’t be upset, but what you’re doing isn’t just “being upset”. You’ve chosen a hill to die on and you’re just being stubborn in your mismanagement of your own emotions. You’re lashing out.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
Are you telling me I don’t get to have an opinion? That seems... ironic.. I’m not sad he got banned, I’m sad we’re losing a ww player over this, possibly two if you keep this up.



Sorry I forgot, you liking someone means there are actual stakes here that anyone should care about. Someone LB likes got a ban, stop the presses this is some important ****ing **** right here!
No one is telling you that you can’t be upset, but what you’re doing isn’t just “being upset”. You’ve chosen a hill to die on and you’re just being stubborn in your mismanagement of your own emotions. You’re lashing out.
Liking people is sort of a big deal.
I'd do it for you too.
I have a lot more to say here but that's a start.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
No one is telling you that you can’t be upset, but what you’re doing isn’t just “being upset”. You’ve chosen a hill to die on and you’re just being stubborn in your mismanagement of your own emotions. You’re lashing out.
fwiw, there's probably a lot more to dustin reacting this way than simply kelhus being banned. POG has a long and storied history.......
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:00 PM
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnsall
Plus we know it's ok to blame being emotional to being on the ***, so that's nice.
No, only the witches can do that because we know the moon cycles and tides.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Liking people is sort of a big deal.
I'd do it for you too.
I have a lot more to say here but that's a start.

And I’m trying to do it for you, right now. Please stop. Be upset, rant to me on discord, write a blog post somewhere on all the ways this is unfair, but please don’t die on this hill here. Step away from the thread and take a breath. Nothing you do here is going to bring him back and everything you are doing could jeopardize the fun times we will have playing games together in the future (CYOA and onward).
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggerboat
fwiw, there's probably a lot more to dustin reacting this way than simply kelhus being banned. POG has a long and storied history.......

Sure, I’m new and don’t know anything. Humbly admit I have no business being here discussing this matter. I’ll kindly exit now.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:04 PM
I mostly ignore kelhus cause whatever, didn't see a lot of posts that his posts were bad in themselves but they inevitably would be and/or were made in bad faith.

If his alt account was banned then whatever.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
And I’m trying to do it for you, right now. Please stop. Be upset, rant to me on discord, write a blog post somewhere on all the ways this is unfair, but please don’t die on this hill here. Step away from the thread and take a breath. Nothing you do here is going to bring him back and everything you are doing could jeopardize the fun times we will have playing games together in the future (CYOA and onward).
There are issues related to censorship and moderation where hard lines have to be drawn. This is what biggerboat is referring to. And yeah it's unfortunate, but eyebooger should have never become mod of that thread-- it should have been ianaww-- and the consequences of that sort of need to be reaped.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
So are CN and VMF, yes.
I was unbanned 7 years ago lmfao, I haven’t made 10 new accounts, I’m on my original!

You are a mess, LB
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
I was unbanned 7 years ago lmfao



You are a mess, LB
So you're saying if someone behaves fine and they were banned in the past they should be allowed to post?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:09 PM
You’re being a Karen, LB. Take a break.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
Sure, I’m new and don’t know anything. Humbly admit I have no business being here discussing this matter. I’ll kindly exit now.
No no no no. That is definitely not what I meant.

Just wanted to insert that there's a lot going on that someone new here might not pick up on.

You are a great addition here. Don't want to suggest anything else.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
Sure, I’m new and don’t know anything. Humbly admit I have no business being here discussing this matter. I’ll kindly exit now.
You're totally fine being in this discussion. You're new here for sure but obviously I do think you're great.
You don't know all the history though and bigger is right that there is more to it than just Kelhus. I definitely appreciate your motivations for keeping the peace and us all getting along etc, but there is still a 'serious business' aspect to what goes on here especially when it comes to political discussion-- which I'll fully admit is likely 100% my fault when it comes to political discussion and POG. But again, issues of censorship and banning are sort of a big deal.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:15 PM
so luckbox’s real complaint is that hierarchical protocol was not followed
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
so luckbox’s real complaint is that hierarchical protocol was not followed
I have all sorts of complaints but I don't recall making that one.
Oh...saying eyebooger didn't have the authority....yeah he doesn't. Eyebooger was put in place to temp ban Master when he needs it.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
09-18-2020 , 01:26 PM
I really don't have any interest in relitigating this, but just want to comment on a few things.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
He basically admits there was no reason other than that Kelhus is a previously banned poster.
I do not admit this, and even if I did, being banned that many times and causing even the slightest hint of a problem would be enough anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Pretty much all of your other minor actions have also been incorrect fwiw.
You don't know all of the minor actions that I've taken.

Also, you don't know all of the minor actions I haven't taken.

The median poster here seems to think the ban was justified and if anything that I was not quick enough in banning him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
EB doesn't have that authority.
So go make an ATF post about it if you feel that strongly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
So are CN and VMF, yes.
Crossnerd is not banned.

As for Jsmith, you can make the case that he should be banned. (And probably many people here would support it if I did). Maybe it was an error not to ban him.

The key differences in this case are the number of times permabanned and the fact that at least one of the bans was by a POG mod.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Eyebooger was put in place to temp ban Master when he needs it.
This is just straight nonsense.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote

      
m