Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
POG Politics Thread Version 3 POG Politics Thread Version 3

11-12-2022 , 06:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
I think they actually made doing this illegal to prevent this very thing.
I'll need to research that as I'm supposed to get blood pressure medicine for my dad
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-12-2022 , 11:46 PM
it's really amazing that people keep voting for dems and repubs.... i mean jfc they are ****ing us all over so bad it's insane
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
it's really amazing that people keep voting for dems and repubs.... i mean jfc they are ****ing us all over so bad it's insane
How common are options in the US?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 10:16 AM
Wonder how hard it is to actually run for political seats. I voted for some guy cause he had a cool name
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
How common are options in the US?
lol filthy
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booker Wolfbox
lol filthy
That's what I thought. I realize you can have independent candidates, but I wonder if the US would benefit from a more formalized multi-party system.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
That's what I thought. I realize you can have independent candidates, but I wonder if the US would benefit from a more formalized multi-party system.
We have a variety of other parties - Libertarian, Socialist Workers, Green, U.S. Taxpayers, Communist, Forward, Constitution, Alliance and a number of others that I'm sure I'm forgetting.

What they all lack is a critical mass of support, organization and/or funding. They may occasionally get a boost from a charismatic candidate or from someone who's absurdly wealthy, but it doesn't last.

There are a variety of reasons for that, but one is the "big tent" approach taken by the main parties. If you're passionate about an issue one party or the other will take you in. Even if there is another wing of the party diametrically opposed to that position. They'll happily lie to you to get your vote. See, e.g. the dems and environmental policy, the republicans and gov't spending.

It's all a scheme, designed to maximize financial advantage for the political class and their running dogs. /filthycliffnotes
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 01:49 PM
it's not "lolfilthy" it's "lolusa"

the blame isn't on the left. the blame is on the stranglehold that the elite have on everything

the elites own the sources of information, and own the politicians, and own the judges, and own everything

that's why it doesn't matter what the people want. we want healthcare. we want peace. we want a livable planet. we want fair wealth distribution. we want affordable housing... all wildly popular, and doable.


and it's not even "left". these are very mainstream, middle of the road, what pretty much everyone wants
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
it's not "lolfilthy" it's "lolusa"

the blame isn't on the left. the blame is on the stranglehold that the elite have on everything

the elites own the sources of information, and own the politicians, and own the judges, and own everything

that's why it doesn't matter what the people want. we want healthcare. we want peace. we want a livable planet. we want fair wealth distribution. we want affordable housing... all wildly popular, and doable.


and it's not even "left". these are very mainstream, middle of the road, what pretty much everyone wants
Sorry, the lolfilthy still applies. Your third paragraph sums up our political system beautifully.

You *do* understand why people vote for Dems or Repubs, you just don't like it.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booker Wolfbox
Shocking! Shocking I tell you that a political party might want to do something that favors themselves.

Are they also saying that Democrats want to extend the franchise to domesticated animals? If letting Fluffy and Bailey vote meant more votes for them you know they’d float it.
It would mean more votes for them and they haven't floated it, so I don't see what your point is
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
That's what I thought. I realize you can have independent candidates, but I wonder if the US would benefit from a more formalized multi-party system.
Almost can't happen with our first-past-the-post voting system that is in place almost everywhere.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 02:22 PM
it's an unsustainable system. if the people don't revolt, the planet will
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
It would mean more votes for them and they haven't floated it, so I don't see what your point is

POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 06:53 PM
just watched the scene in the crown where they execute russian royalty in 1917

good stuff!!!

but i think we were supposed to feel sympathy for them lol
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
just watched the scene in the crown where they execute russian royalty in 1917

good stuff!!!

but i think we were supposed to feel sympathy for them lol
It was all gratuitous though and they had already abdicated and the Bolsheviks already had power-- and there were kids that were killed so even if you want to hold the adults responsible for their crimes the kids were innocent.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 09:15 PM
Like in Anastasia
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-13-2022 , 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
It was all gratuitous though and they had already abdicated and the Bolsheviks already had power-- and there were kids that were killed so even if you want to hold the adults responsible for their crimes the kids were innocent.
plz
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 06:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
It was all gratuitous though and they had already abdicated and the Bolsheviks already had power-- and there were kids that were killed so even if you want to hold the adults responsible for their crimes the kids were innocent.
of all the killings the bolsheviks did, this one makes by far and away the most sense.

there was specific and sensible, motivation for killing them in the spectrum of ongoing civil disorder and war
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
plz
Not exactly a surprising response
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 03:05 PM
We need a truthfulness index for people in different categories.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Not exactly a surprising response
When you say stuff like "won't someone please think of the Monarchs" when talking about a revolution the responses kind of right themselves.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
When you say stuff like "won't someone please think of the Monarchs" when talking about a revolution the responses kind of right themselves.
Talking about children though not monarchs.

And the revolution was over.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Talking about children though not monarchs.

And the revolution was over.
oh the communists won! we live in a communist world now ! woo hoo!!!



revolution def wasn't over. they had a century long fight, that they eventually lost
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-14-2022 , 04:47 PM
Killing 12 year olds to fight the boog.

It's a losing argument here on this one.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-15-2022 , 11:40 PM
royalty apologist
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote

      
m