Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
I really don't have any interest in relitigating this, but just want to comment on a few things.
This was your action that you took unilaterally without consulting anyone. It was never litigated the first time so let's do it now.
Quote:
I do not admit this, and even if I did, being banned that many times and causing even the slightest hint of a problem would be enough anyway.
Do you have any idea how easy it was to get banned under Wookie and Jman or just why so many complaints were made about them?
Quote:
You don't know all of the minor actions that I've taken.
Also, you don't know all of the minor actions I haven't taken.
What I've seen has not been good.
Quote:
The median poster here seems to think the ban was justified and if anything that I was not quick enough in banning him.
So we're going to take a vote then?
Thrice
Quote:
As for Jsmith, you can make the case that he should be banned. (And probably many people here would support it if I did). Maybe it was an error not to ban him.
The key differences in this case are the number of times permabanned and the fact that at least one of the bans was by a POG mod.
This is just straight nonsense.
And it was WN (long time pogger) who allowed Kelhus to come back where he posted in politics for over a year without getting banned. He plays werewolf on MU, he came here and played HP one other game, was signed up for CYOA and you ban him because of what?
If there weren't posts then it was just because people complained and his record. But that isn't good enough.