Quote:
Originally Posted by kokiri
The UK government managed to switch my identity 18 months ago or so for that of a petty criminal with the same name, so that i was getting chased by baliffs, had an arrest warrant out against me (well it wasn't me, but it was someone with my address with my name...), and so on. So if they get my DNA, i have zero confidence that they won't accidentally switch it with the dna of a rapist or something.
and the whole dna-database idea is based essentially around a 'no smoke without fire' thought process whereby if you're taken in by the police, even if you're not charged, then you're clearly a dodgy customer, so probably are a criminal. In the wrong hands, the powers that the government is trying to get its hands on would be terrifying.,
I have zero confidence in this government being able to handle any data. Your story is hardly an isolated case and they have proved time and time again that they are incapable of keeping sensitive data from the public domain. Cases like yours are another reason that I am against
Jacqui Smith's plans to expand the recent trials in to 'Sarah's Law'.
The government's data handling rules are ******ed and any intelligent person can see that they are always going to lead to many cases like the ones that have happened where data gets left on trains etc. Workers are not allowed to send any remotely sensitive data electronically and encryption services are all blocked from computers with any sensitive data. The only way workers can move the data around is to physically carry it around on unprotected disks.
I would still be against the storage of DNA records of innocent people without the court ruling and if our government / police force was remotely competent at handling such evidence. Under the current circumstances, I think we are headed for some catastrophic headlines where numerous people will end up dead or in jail based on evidence that should never have been used in the first place.
Going off on a little tangent about bailiffs, we receive regular letters from debt collection agencies that are aimed at someone who lived in our house before the current landlord owned the place (He bought it 5 years ago). We have no forwarding address so each time a new agency sends a threatening letter, we inform them that he no longer lives here. That rarely stops the letters and they all use premium rate phone lines (wtf? Who OK'd that idea?) so we don't follow it up any further. We have all of our remotely valueable property catalogued and are prepared for a legal field day just in case any bailiffs manage to get in.