Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
POG Politics Thread POG Politics Thread

09-19-2017 , 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Russia supplying Venezuela with 600,000 tonnes of grain as US seeks to sanction VZ and prevent other countries from trading with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Does no one care about this?
that's cool news. i didn't know about that. thanks!

let's just hope north korea doesn't help out too because then, well it'd just be too confusing.
09-19-2017 , 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
It might be an over generalization but it's hardly sexist
Making over generalizations or stereotyping people based on sex is sexist..
09-19-2017 , 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
Making over generalizations or stereotyping people based on sex is sexist..
Tautology
09-19-2017 , 06:30 PM
09-19-2017 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Tautology
09-19-2017 , 08:54 PM
VMF how do you square your attitude towards immigrants/refugees with the US policy towards Jews fleeing Nazi Germany?
09-19-2017 , 08:58 PM
Only person itt I've missed more than vmf is monkey...where is that loveable race baiter?
09-19-2017 , 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotawerewolf
VMF how do you square your attitude towards immigrants/refugees with the US policy towards Jews fleeing Nazi Germany?
I think our country needs to protect our citizens. I don't really think of it as a comparison to Nazi Germany because in some of these situations the area is dangerous because of the whole community, not a dictator.

I am for doing what we can to help refugees, I think one of the main priorities of the government just needs to be citizen safety. The money to operate the government does come from the citizens. We also don't have an unlimited amount of money... if refugees get it, another group that is actually paying taxes, is not getting that money.

With immigrants, I know people who want citizenship from countries that are waiting in line. I think we need to come to an agreement on how many immigrants we can accept a year and do it

I don't really feel like I have an "attitude" towards immigrants. I think illegal immigration being cracked down on is needed to have a country. Most countries don't want the same laws USA has...
09-19-2017 , 09:11 PM
I'll pay some thousands to our government this year. I want that money going towards protecting us. Maybe they can use it to train our police officers to not have so many incidents of police brutality. Maybe they can use it to improve our infrastructure. Could even use that money to improve our health care.

If we choose to bring in refugees, it is an act of charity and it will cancel out a plan that could help citizens.

It is amazing how the same people who think that the USA is an awful place, think it is somehow going to be the first place to instill socialism and not collapse. Some great civilizations have collapsed before...
09-20-2017 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWetzel
the moderator responsible for this travesty needs to show their face immediately
I unbanned VMF. You call it a travesty, you are entitled to your opinion, I obviously disagree with your opinion. Beyond this thread, VMF has a long history of participating in other POG games which is very much valued, welcome, and needed.

This thread isn't intended to be an echo chamber, if you can't tolerate reading specific posters view points/posts, you are free to use the ignore function.

If any poster breaks official 2p2 rules use the report function.

You are all adults, act like it. Nobody should have to babysit this thread. Have civil discourse.

If the collective community can't tolerate other's opposing views/opinions, then ultimatly this thread won't exist in the future, all political discussion will be directed to the official 2p2 Politics forum.

I simply will not remove/exclude people from this thread just because they have a different view point from the majority or others. Debate/discuss or ignore if you are incapable of participating. If you don't like any of those options, don't open the thread.

Last edited by Puzzles; 09-20-2017 at 02:57 AM.
09-20-2017 , 02:27 AM
anyone have any opinions on ken burns vietnam documentary? i only saw about 10 minutes of it. it seemed pretty good
09-20-2017 , 07:44 AM
didn't watch it, I can sowly pan across photographs all by myself
09-20-2017 , 10:32 AM
Wait till you read about sex crimes by un peacekeepers
09-20-2017 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puzzles
I unbanned VMF. You call it a travesty, you are entitled to your opinion, I obviously disagree with your opinion. Beyond this thread, VMF has a long history of participating in other POG games which is very much valued, welcome, and needed.

This thread isn't intended to be an echo chamber, if you can't tolerate reading specific posters view points/posts, you are free to use the ignore function.

If any poster breaks official 2p2 rules use the report function.

You are all adults, act like it. Nobody should have to babysit this thread. Have civil discourse.

If the collective community can't tolerate other's opposing views/opinions, then ultimatly this thread won't exist in the future, all political discussion will be directed to the official 2p2 Politics forum.

I simply will not remove/exclude people from this thread just because they have a different view point from the majority or others. Debate/discuss or ignore if you are incapable of participating. If you don't like any of those options, don't open the thread.
Well, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised.

If you really think the ban was based on "just having a different view point from others", then you need to do some damn research. If your goal is to have a **** thread and to have people not participate in POG anymore because it's ****, then you're doing a wonderful job.
09-20-2017 , 12:49 PM
The New Yorker did a profile on NK the other day that I thought we pretty good. It gives a history of the country and the Kims and talks about their perception of the US and our goals. It stresses how important the lack of any sort of diplomacy is, and what some of the consequences of that is. It's a good read for anyone who thinks MAD, or even just self assured destruction for NK, is all the deterrence we need.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.new...orth-korea/amp

Quote:
In 1966, Thomas Schelling, the deterrence expert, wrote that brinkmanship hinges, above all, on “beliefs and expectations.” Our grasp of North Korea’s beliefs and expectations is not much better than its grasp of ours. To go between Washington and Pyongyang at this nuclear moment is to be struck, most of all, by how little the two understand each other. In eighteen years of reporting, I’ve never felt as much uncertainty at the end of a project, a feeling that nobody—not the diplomats, the strategists, or the scholars who have devoted their lives to the subject—is able to describe with confidence how the other side thinks. We simply don’t know how Kim Jong Un really regards the use of his country’s nuclear arsenal, or how much North Korea’s seclusion and mythology has distorted its understanding of American resolve. We don’t know whether Kim Jong Un is taking ever-greater risks because he is determined to fulfill his family’s dream of retaking South Korea, or because he is afraid of ending up like Qaddafi.

To some in the Trump Administration, the gaps in our knowledge of North Korea represent an argument against deterrence; they are unwilling to assume that Pyongyang will be constrained by the prospect of mutually assured destruction. But, if the alternative is a war with catastrophic costs, then gaps in our knowledge should make a different case. Iraq taught us the cost of going to war against an adversary that we do not fully understand. Before we take a radical step into Asia, we should be sure that we’re not making that mistake again.
09-20-2017 , 12:59 PM
I should clarify that by, MAD not being enough of a deterrent on its own, I mean it's not something we should be able to fall back on while we do whatever we want to them (ie sanctions, threats, military action)
09-20-2017 , 01:00 PM
Lol @ the iraq analogy
09-20-2017 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
U.S. opposition to immigration in general in the late 1930s was motivated by the grave economic pressures, the high unemployment rate, and social frustration and disillusionment. The U.S. refusal to support specifically Jewish immigration, however, stemmed from something else, namely antisemitism, which had increased in the late 1930s and continued to rise in the 1940s. It was an important ingredient in America's negative response to Jewish refugees.
#neveragain
09-20-2017 , 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Lol @ the iraq analogy
The analogy is less lol if the"we" is the general population. There was a lot of general support for the Iraq war in 2003.

09-20-2017 , 01:14 PM
Fair enough. I definitely wasn't taking it that way.
09-20-2017 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoraciousReader
When you choose to marry a man who brags about "grabbing women by the pussy," you pretty much forfeit your right to complain about sexist remarks.
Feminists are often the most sexist
09-20-2017 , 01:17 PM
Maybe it's like training day? Some weird mental thing
09-20-2017 , 01:20 PM
Some pretty solid racism in that article.
09-20-2017 , 01:22 PM
That's hilarious about people lying about their iraq war support btw....or it could be they just cheated in the polls too ofc

      
m