Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban? Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban?

01-25-2015 , 12:46 PM
Just browsing the forums on my mobile device, and this thread is constantly at the top because of all the drama, so I'm reading it. Or did I need your permission?
01-25-2015 , 12:47 PM
Right, didn't think so
01-25-2015 , 01:02 PM
I have no dog in this fight (or weirdo) but domer's post was pretty funny.
01-25-2015 , 01:08 PM
Can a green ban another green?
01-25-2015 , 01:09 PM
WN's continued presence on POG should answer that one jay.
01-25-2015 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moocher
WN's continued presence on POG should answer that one jay.
Have you tried to ban him when he changed to purple?
01-25-2015 , 01:10 PM
first thing i did
01-25-2015 , 01:27 PM
lol people crying
01-25-2015 , 01:29 PM
Leo's ban was orders of magnitude worse than quarr's for multiple reasons that should be obvious, not the least of which is that quarr has a history of infractions outside of that particular Artie Lange style outburst and Leo, to my knowledge, does not. I didn't even think Leo's post was intended to be taken in the way that at least one mod interpreted it, but I understand that modding can be challenging (although not super difficult, since Moocher can apparently do it, but whatever) and that Leo's temp is probably just as much an example to others a la that prospective ISIS nurse from Colorado getting four years (wait, isn't Leo from Colorado?) that #womanemotions posts are apparently going to be judged a bit more harshly from now on.

People focusing on cn's reaction to quarr are focusing on the wrong thing.
01-25-2015 , 01:37 PM
Having a SHATS game tomorrow does seem like kismet, though
01-25-2015 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
I understand that modding can be challenging (although not super difficult, since Moocher can apparently do it)
01-25-2015 , 01:53 PM
this all boils down to You never know what will offend people. if I called someone a ****ing weirdo and they'd said you sound like a bitch, that seems 100% tit for tat.

if I call someone a weirdo and they come back at me with an incoherent rambling of go **** yourself who gives a **** about you go suck a dick, then yeah here's a problem.

obv quarrr said something about nerd that was awful and the rest of you non-females should respect that she was offended.

also I don't get half of the insults that xnerd gets bc I'm nowhere near as provoking as she is but that doesn't mean she should not be ALLOWED to be insulted.

and that bitch exchange btwn me and willi was nothing
01-25-2015 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNothing
i was blackmailed by PM - if i wanted to see what quarrr said, i'd have to change my avatar

i refused bc lion kitty makes everyone happy

It really is the best
01-25-2015 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNothing
and that bitch exchange btwn me and willi was nothing
Too late, the process of him being perma'd is already in motion.
01-25-2015 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
Too late, the process of him being perma'd is already in motion.
well I'm obv not going to stand in the way
01-25-2015 , 02:01 PM
LKJ will you act as defense attorney for leo
01-25-2015 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
Leo's ban was orders of magnitude worse than quarr's for multiple reasons that should be obvious, not the least of which is that quarr has a history of infractions outside of that particular Artie Lange style outburst and Leo, to my knowledge, does not. I didn't even think Leo's post was intended to be taken in the way that at least one mod interpreted it, but I understand that modding can be challenging (although not super difficult, since Moocher can apparently do it, but whatever) and that Leo's temp is probably just as much an example to others a la that prospective ISIS nurse from Colorado getting four years (wait, isn't Leo from Colorado?) that #womanemotions posts are apparently going to be judged a bit more harshly from now on.

People focusing on cn's reaction to quarr are focusing on the wrong thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNothing
this all boils down to You never know what will offend people. if I called someone a ****ing weirdo and they'd said you sound like a bitch, that seems 100% tit for tat.

if I call someone a weirdo and they come back at me with an incoherent rambling of go **** yourself who gives a **** about you go suck a dick, then yeah here's a problem.

obv quarrr said something about nerd that was awful and the rest of you non-females should respect that she was offended.

also I don't get half of the insults that xnerd gets bc I'm nowhere near as provoking as she is but that doesn't mean she should not be ALLOWED to be insulted.

and that bitch exchange btwn me and willi was nothing
These are both good posts.
01-25-2015 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
LKJ will you act as defense attorney for leo
Asking lkj to out-act Arec Bardwin seems like kind of a tall order; maybe Gad should act as co-counsel?
01-25-2015 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
Having a SHATS game tomorrow does seem like kismet, though
I'm fairly sure all of these modding decisions are being made for the sole purpose of Hoya promoting his own game, at this point, lol
01-25-2015 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
LKJ will you act as defense attorney for leo
Nah. I mean, I think that was a bad ban, but Leo plays on unouted gimmicks so I'll look the other way on pretty much anything short of blunt force trauma.
01-25-2015 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabethebabe
When a person is released from prison, it is that person that is on probation, not the entire community.

The 3m ban of quarrr is overdone. A week would have been good. He clearly needed a cool-off period.

There is biased modding going on, things cannot be said to/about CN, while if you provoke TN similarly, mods barely raise an eyebrow.
He's been trying to get himself banned all week. He's a negative asset both in games and out of them due to his lack of respect for rules, authority, and other people in general. Three months was trigger-shy if anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
Leo's ban was orders of magnitude worse than quarr's for multiple reasons that should be obvious, not the least of which is that quarr has a history of infractions outside of that particular Artie Lange style outburst and Leo, to my knowledge, does not. I didn't even think Leo's post was intended to be taken in the way that at least one mod interpreted it, but I understand that modding can be challenging (although not super difficult, since Moocher can apparently do it, but whatever) and that Leo's temp is probably just as much an example to others a la that prospective ISIS nurse from Colorado getting four years (wait, isn't Leo from Colorado?) that #womanemotions posts are apparently going to be judged a bit more harshly from now on.

People focusing on cn's reaction to quarr are focusing on the wrong thing.
Leo's post was completely inappropriate and unprovoked. I imagine that the punishment for it was harsher due to the circumstances in which he was piling on someone who had just been attacked recently in the same thread, which makes sense.
01-25-2015 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nofear3838
I'm fairly sure all of these modding decisions are being made for the sole purpose of Hoya promoting his own game, at this point, lol
Its too bad he cant use a gimmick in his own game
01-25-2015 , 02:22 PM
OR CAN HE
01-25-2015 , 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nofear3838
I'm fairly sure all of these modding decisions are being made for the sole purpose of Hoya promoting his own game, at this point, lol
Oh you
01-25-2015 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
He's been trying to get himself banned all week. He's a negative asset both in games and out of them due to his lack of respect for rules, authority, and other people in general. Three months was trigger-shy if anything.



Leo's post was completely inappropriate and unprovoked. I imagine that the punishment for it was harsher due to the circumstances in which he was piling on someone who had just been attacked recently in the same thread, which makes sense.
This is the internet. There is no authority.

      
m