The highlight of your career is a camvid on youtube playing dwetzel
quite well.
BATM, I could go into a longer explanation about how it's clear to me that (1) your PMs to players in the game, such as CrimsonFox, were misleading or intentionally confusing, (2) your game had no win condition for the majority of the game, (3) the game was not werewolf on day 1, (4) many players had no idea what team they were on, and (5) you designed the game in a way where you knew you had outed essentially 15 out of 21 roles on day 1. But instead, I'll quote you about your own game:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrokenATM!
I know right. Is like having a game and not telling the WILves they are wolbes. They out themselves on day1 but no one did anything. I thought the game was broken and I should have told wolves they were wolves tbh
There's no way I'm going to be apologizing to you for saying your game was broken and dumb. I'm also not going to apologize for concluding that your confusing / misleading PMs were intentional - EVEN IF THAT MEANS WITH GOOD INTENTIONS - efforts to maintain the premise of your game (that premise being an information vacuum). I am not presenting some rude, minority view. All I've asked you to do to fix this part of the problem in the future is
let people know that you're running a game that is not werewolf. Then I seriously do not care what you do in the game. In this case you actively recruited people for werewolf and they got something else. That is a minor part of your infraction.
The major part of your infraction is the personal attacks. I've been really clear about this: I do not care that they were retaliatory. You cannot do that. DWetzel
also cannot do that. I did not
take his side - I said I understand being pissed off about your game, but did not understand coming at you about your family or being a terrible person. I've communicated with him on Skype as well, to make sure we're on the same page. I don't even have a side except that I want BOTH of you to stop being difficult to moderate.
Finally, in the spirit of good cheer, I'm going to announce a slight revision to the ruling: BATM's has been reduced to 50 points. I'm doing this because the majority of people seem to think I've overstepped, even though I genuinely disagree. I'd rather we have happy POG than Hoya-is-crazy POG.
That said, I will point out to everyone that infractions are only effective if they
actually do something to alter unacceptable behavior. My job is to try to make POG good, basically. I cannot have Wetzel screaming about taking away BATM's kids or BATM telling people to suck things, eat other things, get ****ed, **** off, threatening that he'd break their ****ing face, or telling other people who offer constructive feedback about the modding issue to **** off, too (he did this to killer, with whom he had another problematic mod interaction).
I also cannot have a situation where people constantly get temped, especially over the holidays (because that sucks), and then come back and do the same garbage again. We all know 10 point infractions accomplish literally nothing. We all know that temping someone for personal attacks ends up with the lame arguments about whether they need to be perma'd or not (this is not true in SE, where it works well, but then modding here has taught me more clearly than posting here ever could that this is NOT SE). Both solutions are totally unsatisfactory.
The 65 point infraction was the result of my wanting to make a serious effort to force BATM to stop doing the personal attacks and overwhelmingly rude and obnoxious and aggressive thing that he does on a regular basis. I've previously infracted him 20 points for an incident with TN, which has since expired. I don't think 20 points matters to him (or anyone). I
do think 65 points ACTUALLY has a likelihood of curbing his worst habits, which would be good for him and for us. I DON'T think 65 points prevents him from doing
anything he's currently allowed to do. Frankly, I defy anyone to explain to me what it is that he CANNOT do if he has 65 points, that he WOULD be allowed to do if he had 20? The answer to this is obviously nothing, right?
Anyway, I'm reducing it to maintain happiness in the community and in acknowledgement that even though *I* think I'm right, lots of you don't. Wetzel's will stay the same because the kids stuff was just garbage and I know he understands the situation.
That is all.