Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban? Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban?

01-13-2015 , 01:38 AM
I like Quarrrr as a person, but he has been skirting the line between apologetic and patronizing after each transgression. I am easily open to forgiving someone who is genuinely sorry and tries to improve, but I do not believe Quarrrr intends to do the respectful thing at this particular moment in time, for whatever reason. The lack of respect for others combined with the lack of acknowledged self responsibility is why I think he may deserve a sanction, and I'm generally very laissez faire
01-13-2015 , 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya

I also hate the idea of policing -EV play

makes this hard
Let me just stop you right here. Don't take offense to this but you nor anyone else is the authority on whether plays are +EV or -ev.

You don't police this claim at all. You police the quitting and strictly the quitting.

We don't want our mods big Brothering our strategical decisions, just our decisions that hurt the game from a game integrity or participation standpoint.

glgl
01-13-2015 , 01:48 AM
what's the tally so far amongst people who played in this game with him?
01-13-2015 , 01:49 AM
that's why you get paid the big bucks hoya


i propose a temporary 1 month off

just pretend it was only because of the zero posting as a wolf if the other thing makes you queasy (understandable). i don't believe it would be remotely controversial or unwarranted given the seeming lack of remorse or acknowledgement that some people gaf about the games

Last edited by jenningst77; 01-13-2015 at 01:55 AM.
01-13-2015 , 02:00 AM
i don't think there is any behavior that won't be defended by someone here.

sounds like a previous troublemaker just straight ruined a game and quit because he didnt feel like playing. who wants to sign up to play with a guy like that? hang em high
01-13-2015 , 02:05 AM
getting more and more obvious that 72off is a Hurp Durpington gimmick
01-13-2015 , 02:06 AM
I think I'm going to have to just say there's a "know it when you see it" standard regarding actively giving the finger to the games, and that Quarrrr satisfies that standard, particularly given that in his very last game he simply quit and was warned, and openly dumped his obligation to help his team in the next one.

Also, this just kind of ticks me off:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Quarrrr:

Without being a jerk about it, your attitude about dipping out of a game, which screws all of us and the mod, is not appreciated. You're right that WW is not very important vis a vis other priorities in life. You're wrong that this means that when you sign up, you get to choose whether to participate or not. When you sign up, you commit to play. We can't run games if people view playing as optional.

You can expect either a significant infraction or ban after we discuss this.

I think the two most pertinent things to remember are:

1. ALL you have to do is tell the mod you are out / have an issue, and you have solved about 95% of the problem. I straight-up reject any argument that one can become so busy that that's impossible. When you don't tell the mod, you screw over the mod, who has no idea wtf to do about your non-participation, and who doesn't know if you'll show up or not.

2. When you ditch a game, you break the game by tanking your team's win equity, which is bad but made way worse by the fact that it's rude and arrogant. The players put in time they could spend, like you chose to spend, doing something else. They chose to play a game with you, which you chose to **** up. So lame and lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
Hoya bro, you don't have to bother yourself telling me all this. I fully understand what I did wrong and what exactly did it cause. I'm not a jerk, I just sometimes happen to act like one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
I give precisely zero ****s about whether you now realize that sucked. All my ****s are reserved for making it way less likely that people continue to do this. You are, you may notice, not the first. I want to cure that issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
The good news for you is you'll probably avoid whatever we decide the standard should be, since you didn't know it was the standard because it wasn't, yet, the standard.

Can't be hosing you unfairly now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
Soooo you don't want to discuss it, it appears, tho you said you did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
If you think, me personally in this scenario should be banned for this, you should not wait for further discussion or anything but punish me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
I mean me ruining my relations with monkey and being said by rawrs that he was worried for my well being gave me enough of a reality check that no length of a ban would make it worse for me.

So from my own subjective judgement ban would be unnecessery.


Peace
01-13-2015 , 02:09 AM
That's the "lack of self responsibility" that I think is even more worthy of contempt than the actual deed
01-13-2015 , 02:11 AM
Quarrrr will not be playing any WW games for two months. I think that he knew what he was doing and enjoyed trolling people about it. I also think that infractions do nothing at all to prevent him from doing it again, as public censure and his own alleged guilt and consternation about his mistake seemed to have no effect on him.

If I see him sign up for a game between now and March 12, 2015, I will simply ban him and lobby for some sort of massively long 2p2 ban. This means that game mods do not have the flexibility to let him play until March 13, 2015. If you tell him he can, you're just getting him banned.

Quarrrr, if you utilize a gimmick to play I will have you perma'd from 2p2. Please take the time to cool off and work out why you're enjoying trolling games so much, or why you're signing up if you dislike them this much, and come back fresher.

EDIT: If you come back and do it again, I will have you perma'd for that reason, by the way. It's all your call, and you're welcome to contribute to POG in other constructive ways.
01-13-2015 , 02:13 AM
01-13-2015 , 02:16 AM
Sounds appropriately lawyery; A+ use of consternation.

Quarrrr, hope to play with the non-troll version of you sometime in the future. I think most of us liked that guy when he wasn't being selfish.
01-13-2015 , 02:20 AM
CPHoya GOAT
01-13-2015 , 02:22 AM
Time to take my name out of the title yo
01-13-2015 , 02:50 AM
Title looks good
01-13-2015 , 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
just ban most Estonians except willi and qq. they just don't play the same way and looks to be trouble in general
Lenc has defenetly caused least trouble in POG.
01-13-2015 , 02:57 AM
I have no problem with the process you went with.

A more substantial contributor to POG might expect more leeway...but this seems appropriate given the immediacy of the past indiscretion making it less likely he "forgot" all about acceptable standards.
01-13-2015 , 03:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willi
Lenc has defenetly caused least trouble in POG.
well

lenC did quit halfway through the Champ finale game

so maybe there's a pattern here :P

Spoiler:
I kid, I kid, just busting balls
01-13-2015 , 03:32 AM
Let's get rid of this guy Hurp Durpington. Nothing but trouble
01-13-2015 , 03:35 AM
Ban Nutshat

01-13-2015 , 03:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaze13
Title looks good
thread didn't deliver
01-13-2015 , 03:57 AM
Sniff. You can't have 'otter games' without the Otter!
01-13-2015 , 04:54 AM
I need to play a game so I can tell you guys how you're all wrong. :emoticon:
01-13-2015 , 05:01 AM
You definitely need to play a game, Chips. I reread your evisceration of Hurp in a f5 the other day and thought to myself, I wonder what happened to Chips...
01-13-2015 , 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Quarrrr will not be playing any WW games for two months. I think that he knew what he was doing and enjoyed trolling people about it. I also think that infractions do nothing at all to prevent him from doing it again, as public censure and his own alleged guilt and consternation about his mistake seemed to have no effect on him.

If I see him sign up for a game between now and March 12, 2015, I will simply ban him and lobby for some sort of massively long 2p2 ban. This means that game mods do not have the flexibility to let him play until March 13, 2015. If you tell him he can, you're just getting him banned.

Quarrrr, if you utilize a gimmick to play I will have you perma'd from 2p2. Please take the time to cool off and work out why you're enjoying trolling games so much, or why you're signing up if you dislike them this much, and come back fresher.

EDIT: If you come back and do it again, I will have you perma'd for that reason, by the way. It's all your call, and you're welcome to contribute to POG in other constructive ways.
No wonder you people can't play the game, you have no judgement of ones personality whatsoever. No critique thinking or analyzing abilities.

Last edited by Quarrrr; 01-13-2015 at 05:10 AM.
01-13-2015 , 05:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
Ok lemme break it down for you plain and red.



Did I not wanna play anymore? I did want to play.

Was I dieing to see my wolfread flip? Yes.

If Me or my peek is not in danger, do I claim there? Not the slightest bit of chance.

In this scenario whilst I'm not feeling the need of my wolfread to flip, do I still claim? I do.




Everything it was, was just a feeling, that I am gonna be dieing in curiousity in the accuracy of my reads d2 if I'm not gonna see my wolfread flip. It had no weigh to my decision to claim.


EDIT// Everybody can go and see my games history where I'm never suspected throughout the game once go to sleep, wake up to see I've been lynched cause people didn't find a lynch.


People are putting others on ignore, lynching for reasons like "you spam", "you troll", "Your mum", have person aimed fights for pages and god knows what else, now for those who actually solve the game, this ruins the game for them just as much as my poor decision to hard claim did for you. Hint hint, I'm one of the players who actually wants to solve the game, but I have never till now complained about it.
I said in the gamethread I was honest saying the point I'm being punished for was not the reason that I hardclaimed for.

And like I said, if I say honest, it means I am.

See this is where reading into a person would come handy, maybe somebody?

I'm fine with ban but don't you ****ing dare to take yourself a right to make a completely wrong assumption that I would purposely **** others over in a game or call me a liar.

      
m