Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban? Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban?

07-03-2014 , 12:39 PM
Pitch

Why did you ban saymyname
07-03-2014 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Ban chilly imo
chilly was just unbanned this morning afaik. Sounded like he got got a few days back from my intel.
07-03-2014 , 12:40 PM
YG, I don't understand why you're strawmaning it up ITT.
Your examples have absolutely nothing to do with gazz's case.
07-03-2014 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
all I know is that we need an SE mod to take over gimmick hunting for banned posters. I once evaded a ban in SE to post solely in the TEBOW game vs. the lol steelers and some mod got me for a handful of one line gameday posts and extended my regular ban. I even got a seasoned gimmick from wahoopride that was NEVER connected to me and had a 2p2 posting history attached to it and was still sniffed out. POG mods should take lessons from whichever mod got me there.
You suck at ips
07-03-2014 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willi
People have also brought getting modkilled in VR game and being unpleasent to play with and showing WIL in several games.
And thus 18 percent of POG ww regs are now up for discussion for permaban
07-03-2014 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
And thus 18 percent of POG ww regs are now up for discussion for permaban
Sup jason
07-03-2014 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
YG, I don't understand why you're strawmaning it up ITT.
Your examples have absolutely nothing to do with gazz's case.
We can agree that if thediceman was NOT magic_gazz, nobody would be talking about permabanning him, correct?
07-03-2014 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Sup jason
Hai!
07-03-2014 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
And thus 18 79 percent of POG ww regs are now up for discussion for permaban
Spoiler:
fyp
07-03-2014 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Pitch

Why did you ban saymyname
More like gtbitch maybe?
07-03-2014 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
Yg, your buddies on skypechat aren't the pog majority. So far, you're one of less than 5 people who have complained about my return. Everyone else sent sunshine, lollipops, and rainbows.

If you have a problem with me, I am always available to work it out, should you actually have that desire. Otherwise, you're causing a "****ty environment" for me right now and I'd like you to stop.
All of my posts have been directed at your previous actions that led to your perma ban. Since your return, I think you have been perfectly fine and have no problem with you staying as I stated itt earlier
07-03-2014 , 12:43 PM
Also, whilst I'm really unhappy Crossnerd is back, she has never broken a game (that I know of) and didn't try to unlawfully evade her ban (if Hoya is to be believed, and I don't see why we shouldn't) so the Crossnerd stuff is better discussed elsewhere, as the only common thing these two have is that they have been banned.
07-03-2014 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeLady
reban

end thread
07-03-2014 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
And thus 18 percent of POG ww regs are now up for discussion for permaban
Don't ban me Gad. You would miss me too much
07-03-2014 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I'm a little chagrined at having my impulsive and spontaneous rambling skype ideas aired out in the thread but I'll get over it. It was a bad suggestion (and I think I said as much to you in skype like 2 minutes later) and deserves to be brutalized, so oh well.
We weren't on skype, I could never reach you via skype. You don't even remember, do you...
07-03-2014 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Don't ban me Gad. You would miss me too much
everyone gets a little WILly now and then

Spoiler:
twss
07-03-2014 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Pitch

Why did you ban saymyname
because it was starrazz and he was posting TERRIBLY

Last edited by gtpitch; 07-03-2014 at 12:47 PM. Reason: fmp
07-03-2014 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
pot
Nah I don't do that as often as people think I do.

Someone make a game about the Mongols and I will join.
07-03-2014 , 12:46 PM
that makes sense actually, it probably was PMs. Either way!
07-03-2014 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
everyone gets a little WILly now and then

Spoiler:
twss
Tbf, I'm pretty sure I'm 2 for my last 2 in terms of wimness
07-03-2014 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
We can agree that if thediceman was NOT magic_gazz, nobody would be talking about permabanning him, correct?
Absolutely, but this is absolutely irrelevant, since he is, in fact, magic_gazz, and did circumvent the ban. Furthermore, if we extrapolate his thediceman behaviour, it's not banworthy per se, but it doesn't convince me -at all- that he will not do it again.
07-03-2014 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilltown
Nah I don't do that as often as people think I do.

Someone make a game about the Mongols and I will join.
I can use mongolian in my next google translator game and make you Khan.
07-03-2014 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilltown
Nah I don't do that as often as people think I do.

Someone make a game about the Mongols and I will join.
You'll rand poor Chinese farmer and ragequit.
07-03-2014 , 12:47 PM
What about Bigfoot?
07-03-2014 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
Absolutely, but this is absolutely irrelevant, since he is, in fact, magic_gazz, and did circumvent the ban. Furthermore, if we extrapolate his thediceman behaviour, it's not banworthy per se, but it doesn't convince me -at all- that he will not do it again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by younguns87
Obviously I don't, I'm making a point that perma banning someone who has been fine for a year after circumventing a ban is stupid. And that's basically the only reason people are bringing up to ban him
there's not that much room between the former and the latter

certainly not enough to warrant calling the latter a strawman

      
m