Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread

08-31-2020 , 07:02 PM
I want to talk about the fanmail thing because I think the most important point is that in a game like this you have to keep going back and taking new information into account

At the time fanmail claimed I wasn’t sure if he was telling the truth or not, so I took it as tentative information subject to verification

Once he died as Karl Marx, I thought it was very likely to be true information because he had all the role PMs and we thought they hadn’t opened wolf chat yet, so it seemed likely he wasn’t just giving the village the information he was giving his teammates information that they needed about the fascists. This made it way more likely to be true

However, once bsball died we saw that wolfchat was open before Fanmail died so his information was only meant for the village, which immediately makes it very suspect again, but I don’t think a lot of people went back and re-evaluated given the new information
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:13 PM
I don't know what would have changed from reevaluating fanmails info, for the village. We wouldn't have believed dmk and BATM that they were the end of the fascist team - and let's be honest, if we had, people would complain we were too gullible - and we kept aao in the poe in case we needed another fascist out
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:16 PM
Well Fanmail was also sending the info to Tokyo!! So it was mostly true, would be hard for the village to parse out the true and verifiable information form the lies.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:19 PM
you can never believe the media!
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:41 PM
Late to the party but that's cool UD/bird.
Puts a whole new spin on the last 13er that we all played together lol
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:42 PM
Hypothetic: would it be considered against the rules for two wolves to talk about the game outside of wolf chat if they are in the same house?
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iraisetoomuch
Hypothetic: would it be considered against the rules for two wolves to talk about the game outside of wolf chat if they are in the same house?
It’s interesting you ask that because we made a point of only talking about the game in wolf chat but i wasn’t sure what the exact rules were
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zurvan
I wanted to push for only the clear villagers putting in CP entries, but I thought we had enough breathing room that trying to keep people from having a bit of fun would be douchey
That would have been interesting.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 07:47 PM
And does it change anything if you're the last two wolves alive.

Aside, I've known wolves that have called other wolves to remember night actions / wake them up to use bugs etc etc. And often nothing says the format of the wolf chat.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iraisetoomuch
Late to the party but that's cool UD/bird.
Puts a whole new spin on the last 13er that we all played together lol
And I was the third wolf with them, they didn't tell me and I had no clue lol
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 09:08 PM
Generally speaking I don't think neutral(s)s should ever have 33% chance to win in mashes. Even in this game as one. And I'm completely fine with us having an estimate 8-10% equity as intended in the design here

But I think neutrals may have actually had close to 0% equity (unintended) because of the lack of cover roles when wolves had the entire role list

If we make up a fake cover role ourselves that is in the game:

- It's a villager's real role, we can get counterclaimed or immediately outed when that villager dies

- It's a wolf role, immediately outed to the wolf team in secret, later outed to the village when that wolf role dies

If we make up a cover role that isn't in the game:

- Immediately outed to the wolf team because our claimed role is not in the list of all roles given to the wolves

If we don't claim at all:

- POE'd by the wolf team as all the villagers continue to make claims (which is what happened to us here), POE'd as a likely neutral to villagers paying attention as wolves at least have some fake claims to make
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 09:23 PM
Very true CQ, we actually assumed you had a list until someone pointed out that it wasn’t said specifically in the OP. Very challenging position to be in, and one where I actually think it would have been ok for the mods to bounce around claim ideas with you. How does everyone feel about how much mods should be allowed to encourage/support a team when an imbalance is realized?

For example, I thought pwns’s role was hilarious but didn’t play out as fun as on paper. I was wondering if it would be ok for a mod to step in and create a compromise. I thought mods could have altered the role to just move class unrest when pwns died. It’s an oops but I think it might have been more fair that way? What do other people think? Would that have been grossly unfair to communists? How would that have felt to the village?

Or is it just— the game has to run as it is designed and can’t be adjusted mid game?
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crackedquads
Generally speaking I don't think neutral(s)s should ever have 33% chance to win in mashes. Even in this game as one. And I'm completely fine with us having an estimate 8-10% equity as intended in the design here

But I think neutrals may have actually had close to 0% equity (unintended) because of the lack of cover roles when wolves had the entire role list

If we make up a fake cover role ourselves that is in the game:

- It's a villager's real role, we can get counterclaimed or immediately outed when that villager dies

- It's a wolf role, immediately outed to the wolf team in secret, later outed to the village when that wolf role dies

If we make up a cover role that isn't in the game:

- Immediately outed to the wolf team because our claimed role is not in the list of all roles given to the wolves

If we don't claim at all:

- POE'd by the wolf team as all the villagers continue to make claims (which is what happened to us here), POE'd as a likely neutral to villagers paying attention as wolves at least have some fake claims to make
this pretty much, although if marx dies before communists get wolf chat, it's a completely different situation

but if bsball had shot someone else and we had literally all of the roles, it would have been even worse

the most likely scenario though is probably marx and engels surviving until communists get chat on d4, which is still a nearly unwinnable prospect for fascists

in addition to the low equity, it's also largely based on something out of their hands and impossible for them to assess
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
08-31-2020 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uglydelicious
Very true CQ, we actually assumed you had a list until someone pointed out that it wasn’t said specifically in the OP. Very challenging position to be in, and one where I actually think it would have been ok for the mods to bounce around claim ideas with you. How does everyone feel about how much mods should be allowed to encourage/support a team when an imbalance is realized?

For example, I thought pwns’s role was hilarious but didn’t play out as fun as on paper. I was wondering if it would be ok for a mod to step in and create a compromise. I thought mods could have altered the role to just move class unrest when pwns died. It’s an oops but I think it might have been more fair that way? What do other people think? Would that have been grossly unfair to communists? How would that have felt to the village?

Or is it just— the game has to run as it is designed and can’t be adjusted mid game?
I have tweaked midgame before. But not by helping a team to strategize. That is outside the bounds.

You have to be VERY VERY careful though because it's easy to tweak because one team runs really well or plays really well, and it's not always possible to distinguish good play and/or good luck from good design.

Like if Trump actually tries to win, it's a different game. The neutrals peek him n1, and then maybe they use their peeking power to find communists instead of teammates?

Wolfchat opened n1, which meant the team got 2/3 of the role pms right away. That created a big imbalance that the game was not designed for, but it took a really bold and gutsy play by Vig to pull it off. We can't punish him for brilliance by penalizing his team.

Even the argument that there were too many communists, which I think is probably fair is not completely apparent, when you consider that the fascists burned two kills on shortline (a liberal) and then had their kill hijacked and used on a player that was already dying, so three potential communist deaths were avoided.

Four if you count the second bsball lynch.

I keep debating the balance in this game in my head and I don't think we'll ever know, really, but I know that most people seemed like they had a total blast, so I think birdman and UD can call it a win.

So those are some of the problems with trying to adjust after the game is in play. Players have made plans. Players have made decisions based upon what they know or don't know. It can be done, but there has to be a pretty compelling reason.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 08:34 AM
balance schmalance
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggerboat
balance schmalance
Hmm. This bodes well for the upcoming game.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggerboat
balance schmalance
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoraciousMother
Sun Tzu, you are Mitch McConnell, the most evil being on the planet and actually a disguised demonic avian wizard from 10,000 BC Atlantis. You are a lone neutral with a last-man-standing win condition. You begin the game with 3 lives and have the following abilities:
i) Land of the Free: If peeked, you reveal as the Statue of Liberty, a liberal with no abilities.
ii) The best lie is the truth: If you claim or hint at being Mitch McConnell, you will be modkilled. If you make a truthful claim about your role, abilities and actions, PM a quote of that post to the mods and you will lose this ability and gain one life.
iii) Mystery of the Unknown: If any player lists you in a null or unknown category in a reads list or makes an unprompted comment about having no read on you or no idea of your role, PM a quote of that post to the mods and you will gain a night-kill that night. Target any player. You travel back in time to that player's childhood, kidnap them and take them to your underground lair on Jeffrey Epstein's island to enjoy the company of you and the members of the Illuminati pedophile death cult that worships you. Any watching, tracking or information reporting mechanics will show this kill to have been performed by all 3 factions. Each time you successfully use this ability, you gain one life and regain the best lie is the truth.

Special note: if you are somehow removed from the game, you will lose all additional lives and lose the game.
ahahaha i didn't see this at first bc was on mobile. incredible
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 05:05 PM
Hypothetically, the role secretly has no special powers and wins with the fascists until Trump dies and then can win with the liberals.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 05:25 PM
Also, so there really was no hirohito eh? dang
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo!!
Also, so there really was no hirohito eh? dang
no hirohito, correct
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
no hirohito, correct
Hirohito in our hearts, always and forever
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-01-2020 , 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo!!
Also, so there really was no hirohito eh? dang
We are all hirohito
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-02-2020 , 02:52 AM
I had missed the Mitch reveal. Thank you so much for reposting it.
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote
09-02-2020 , 09:21 AM
some say hirohito is still out there, waiting to be found, to this very day
Lighthearted Politics WW Game Thread Quote

      
m