Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Not counterproductive. Three reasons.
1) Until you're sure about your position on the mechanics, the more you think it through in the thread the more you confuse the percentage - 30% to 80%(?) - of players that won't read the whole thread. What if you conclude tomorrow, after establishing a rule today that the seer gun is anti-village, that you're wrong (I'm not saying you are; I think you are partially right, but with exceptions that make the seer gun pro-village and the independent result that the village is vulnerable to at least two obvious wolf ploys that I can think of, and absolutely will not reveal), but half the village missed that memo?
2) As you think it through in the thread you lead others to make related deductions that might be pretty bad for us and that you may not realize result from your conclusions. This is because you are smart - shoulders of giants and all that - and others are, too, but you might not anticipate creativity.
3) The moment one of your prescriptions works out well for the wolves is the moment you get a lot of extra heat, which looks like it will be bad for us since you're looking like a good villager in terms of effort.
The only rule so far is do not fake claim seer peeks, because those claims are likely to be non-verifiable. If one peek is unreliable because of FPS, almost all of the rest will be viewed with skepticism, too. That means we almost certainly lose.
meh, if you cant read the thread for the most updated tips on how to use your gun then you shouldnt have signed up.
everyone signed up to play afaik. playing entails reading the thread in its entirety. if a villager chooses not to then thats just him choosing to **** his team by avoiding doing something that should be obligatory.
this is a huge mishmash. there is gonna be 2k posts today and 2k tomorrow. thats a given. people need to read them.