Quote:
Originally Posted by inDheart
i'm happy to do A or B, and some conditionals on that might help
if spec judging is a separate ranking instead of right next to secondary judging and i'm the only spectator doing this, i'll do A. if more people show up, we can divvy up categories and do B
if it helps the people math work out, i could just fill in gaps and do some written-up categories and some without hardcore writeups
First off, thanks again, inD, for stepping up.
My thinking is the ideal scenario is we get 3 spectator-judges (inD plus 2 others) who each rank every category with little or no write-ups expected. Maybe a paragraph or two to discuss their thought process of how they judged the categories, but hardly an in-depth look at each selection.
If we have 3 spectator-judges, then those of us in the draft can step aside entirely and only judge our own category (with a detailed write-up).
40% primary judge
20% each of 3 spectator-judges
Or, alternately, we can do the proposal put forth by Eric and make it 50% primary and a 50% composite of the secondary judges.
I'll bet if we ask some of the other usual suspects who are active in POG we could find 2 more volunteers. eleanor, Prip, suq, and TN immediately come to mind.