Quote:
Originally Posted by Lissa2
i don't mind the vote but why the focus just how "monte came out better" from their interaction?
like, what does monte having been better within that interaction say about knights. why not comment about knights
the point here was it seemed like you were assuming the interaction couldn't be v/v but as i actually write it out i think it's probably a stupid nit
but gonna go ahead and post it anyway
I mentioned earlier I didn't think it was a performance, so when I read monte coming out better than knights in the exchange I'm inclined to read monte:v and knights:w
Quote:
Originally Posted by theknightsofneeee
question:
why does him coming out better than me make you want to vote me?
the way you phrased it implies that it was more a good look for him than a bad look for me, which makes voting me make no sense.
Because I don't think it was a performance and thus likely not w:w. Monte read more villagery to me, so I think you could be woofin. So imma vote and see how you handle it.
The bolded makes me wonder if you're trying to determine if my vote is wolfy or if you're trying to imply that my vote is wolfy. The former suggests your curious about my alignment, the latter suggests you're trying to frame my alignment for others.