Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The future of Ms POG The future of Ms POG

02-06-2017 , 05:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
BTW, I would like to note that the Ms POG contest is currently about to slide to page 2; I think the interest is at an historic low. It is perfectly possible that what VR or Adam posted changed someone's mind and they chose not to participate bc of it. Which is perfectly fine. This is how it has to be. If the arguments are convincing enough, the game will die down by itself. I think some of drama could have been avoided if VR, Adam or Crossnerd created the thread themselves.
You and domer are the only people who've made an issue about that.

The reason I felt it was worth discussing is it doesn't seem to be attracting all that much interest, so I wondered whether posters like you would be really all that bereft if we just didn't line women up like meat in head to head contests and perhaps tried something else. If you want to condemn me for overestimating you, UD, then fine, I did.
02-06-2017 , 05:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey Banana
For you, to drop in, post something snide and worthless, and then drop out again. For others, perhaps a chance to talk about the issues and consider whether change would be better.

By all means, flay me for working on the premise that the men in this forum are actually grown up enough to talk like adults about it. Perhaps some of them have noticed how few women post regularly in our forum. Perhaps they don't care. Perhaps they prefer to float in a sea of testosterone. Fair enough. I gave you the chance to say so if that's how you feel. People complain when things are done without consultation and some of the posters in good standing in this forum wanted a discussion about it.
I mean you dont post a poll, mods arent going to make a decision so when you created the thread what was the actual point? it literally is just a politics thread without the title then

The reason why so few women post in this forum is cause in case you havent noticed this is a poker forum and it is a male-dominated (and dying) game. If youre acting like the reason we dont have women post here is cause the community as a whole is a sexist misogynistic wasteland, then youre crazy. The only woman I can remember getting run off was VR and that was largely due to Mac who is permabanned for good reason.

I personally enjoy Miss Pog but not to the point of fighting for it to stay if there's such a big hoopla over it. I also dont vote solely on looks and neither do most other people afaik, many of the people who actively participate in pushing for their specific female to win post interviews and funny/personable clips of them. Im not going to say its not a beauty contest cause yes that is the first thing people are looking at. But people like Anna Kendrick/MEW/Kristen Bell/Margot Robbie (to a lesser extent) winning means its not just a beauty contest. Also why you dont see supermodels ever winning.
02-06-2017 , 05:31 AM
People itt acting like their rights are being trodden on by even having this discussion.

Hate speech is not protected speech in the USA#1. And the government imposes its will all the time when it comes to matters of ethics. Nobody ****s on Lincoln or Roe or Brown. Except bigots.
02-06-2017 , 05:32 AM
i would be pretty hyped to play pog person of the year... as long as it didn't devolve into a female beauty contest

i'd be so tilted at all the elon musk votes
02-06-2017 , 05:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puzzles
since we are lone wolf POG mods, I'm going to rename the Ms POG thread to:

POG Person of the Year

and bump it, if any of the other lone wolf mods want to change it back, they have the power
I don't think that's a good idea but by all means, you do you.
02-06-2017 , 05:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
No one would do that to the other groups because it would be ridiculous to do so. And it isn't because it wouldn't be ok. We can come up with easy thought experiments to make it ok.
People did do it to those other groups. Women (and maybe immigrants) are the only group that lingers in this moral gray area. Partially in thanks to views like yours.
02-06-2017 , 05:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puzzles
since we are lone wolf POG mods, I'm going to rename the Ms POG thread to:

POG Person of the Year

and bump it, if any of the other lone wolf mods want to change it back, they have the power
nooooo!! i would never make the same nominations and votes for POY. we'd have to start a whole new game
02-06-2017 , 05:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Like lets say that pog had a small but vocal contingent of Muslims who were heavily against pork but we also had a yearly bbq contest...

Do you see?
Its hard to even come up with anything reasonable for racial differences or sexuallity

But just like some people like pork, some men like women. The point that karemin made is that is unreasonable to expect that on a male dominated forum that that should go unexpressed.

You then twisted his words into cases that just don't fit.
02-06-2017 , 05:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
sorry i'm not quite clear on your post. are you saying it's not objectifying women?

i objectified women in it. i think monkey banana and crossnerd did too. and we are probably on the less sexist side of the spectrum in miss pog. it's the nature of the beast. it's a sexist contest.

and the world is full of examples of groups of people doing things that hurt a minority or even a majority of others.

and again, you're arguing that i need to let you have your personal view. fine. you can have your personal view. but if your personal view is racist or sexist, i'm gonna be offended, and i'm gonna speak up and tell you not to post that in pog.
Okay, now explain what makes the sexist Ms POG different from "top 10 hottest guys in poker" or "Mr POG".

I understand that the argument is that I am a man and I can't understand(unless I'm one of those special enlightened ones). My argument is that they are the same because they are the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
BTW, I would like to note that the Ms POG contest is currently about to slide to page 2; I think the interest is at an historic low. It is perfectly possible that what VR or Adam posted changed someone's mind and they chose not to participate bc of it. Which is perfectly fine. This is how it has to be. If the arguments are convincing enough, the game will die down by itself. I think some of drama could have been avoided if VR, Adam or Crossnerd created the thread themselves.
Stuck said that he won't tally the votes until this abomination of a thread reaches a conclusion. People are playing the waiting game to see whether there will be more crazy aggressive modding(which it seems there is).
02-06-2017 , 05:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puzzles
since we are lone wolf POG mods, I'm going to rename the Ms POG thread to:

POG Person of the Year

and bump it, if any of the other lone wolf mods want to change it back, they have the power
Frankly, I am just going to keep posting votes, and, to a lesser extent, tasteful (non-scantily-clad) pics like I usually do. Shrug.
02-06-2017 , 05:34 AM
No VMF, what I'm saying is who cares? and why are you caring?

There and thousands of contest all over the place that do the same thing beauty contest do, and some of them are very harsh compared to beauty contest.

I never see these people complain when a large group of the public is voting on who the best singer/artist is. Even though there's no difference in that and beauty contest
02-06-2017 , 05:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
People did do it to those other groups. Women (and maybe immigrants) are the only group that lingers in this moral gray area. Partially in thanks to views like yours.
You're not following me
02-06-2017 , 05:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenjaminAO
These are all misconceptions created from woman who feel self confident about their own beauty and don't want to see other woman put on a pedestal for something they can never have. Ouch, that sounds like a tough thing to say.
Lol

The "just jealous" argument.

Still missing "hysterical" and "on her period" though.

So you know Ben, I'm doing ok in the looks department. Don't feel bad about saying something ****ty.
02-06-2017 , 05:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenjaminAO
No VMF, what I'm saying is who cares? and why are you caring?

There and thousands of contest all over the place that do the same thing beauty contest do, and some of them are very harsh compared to beauty contest.

I never see these people complain when a large group of the public is voting on who the best singer/artist is. Even though there's no difference in that and beauty contest
We are each being presented with a decision where we have an impact. I am siding with the idea of progressing further than a simple beauty contest that I do not think holds any value.
02-06-2017 , 05:36 AM
younguns, I explained what I was doing.

Your view isn't unreasonable. So if I said to you, well, let's make it person of the year and have a different focus that's not quite so offensive to some, maybe you'd agree with me, and then we're in a different place.

I mean, I obviously know there are people who just are entrenched in their views both ways, but that doesn't have to be everybody. Having a poll just means someone wins, someone loses, and the losers feel unheard. Having the mods just decide is not really the way we've ever done things. So why not see whether people are a bit flexible and willing to adapt a not very popular thread to a new use that makes more people happy?

If they aren't, fine. I said I wasn't going to try to impose my view. If they are, great, let's talk about what would be a good compromise.
02-06-2017 , 05:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey Banana
You and domer are the only people who've made an issue about that.

The reason I felt it was worth discussing is it doesn't seem to be attracting all that much interest, so I wondered whether posters like you would be really all that bereft if we just didn't line women up like meat in head to head contests and perhaps tried something else. If you want to condemn me for overestimating you, UD, then fine, I did.
Shrug. I think you always knew that I was quite socially conservative.
If you did not know that and it disappoints you, fair enough.

Edit: I think ArcticKnight also had the very same issue domer and I had.
02-06-2017 , 05:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Like lets say that pog had a small but vocal contingent of Muslims who were heavily against pork but we also had a yearly bbq contest...

Do you see?
Being against pork is not the same as being against sexism. The fact you would even make this analogy just demonstrates this false idea that the concerns of women are niche and a matter of personal taste.

Your argument is summarily rejected.
02-06-2017 , 05:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC

Stuck said that he won't tally the votes until this abomination of a thread reaches a conclusion. People are playing the waiting game to see whether there will be more crazy aggressive modding(which it seems there is).
Oh. BTW, I think that tallying votes should be domer's responsibility. You open the thread, you run it.
02-06-2017 , 05:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
Lol

The "just jealous" argument.

Still missing "hysterical" and "on her period" though.

So you know Ben, I'm doing ok in the looks department. Don't feel bad about saying something ****ty.
Labeling my point at "oh the classic blahblahblah thing I won't even consider thinking about because it disagrees with my logic"

nice
02-06-2017 , 05:41 AM
Crossnerd made an awesome post about the thing lenC is talking about: what's the difference between Mr POG and Ms POG. I fear I'll stuff up the argument but it goes something like, women are raised to feel their self-worth is strongly tied to their looks. It's just a fact of a sexist world. But men are raised to feel they have value outside their looks.

I mean, you need only look at films. There are handsome male actors but they are not working just because they're handsome. They are not sold as being just hot. But women often are. They are often in films simply as window dressing.

You may have seen this youtube. I think it's a nice, wry look at that idea:

02-06-2017 , 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
Being against pork is not the same as being against sexism. The fact you would even make this analogy just demonstrates this false idea that the concerns of women are niche and a matter of personal taste.

Your argument is summarily rejected.
karemin made a post and you then posted it with men and women replaced with brown white and gay straight.

That is a fact. But if i try to use Muslim Christian then i dont understand and my argument gets rejected

Ok lol
02-06-2017 , 05:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
Shrug. I think you always knew that I was quite socially conservative.
If you did not know that and it disappoints you, fair enough.

Edit: I think ArcticKnight also had the very same issue domer and I had.
Yes, I know you're conservative but I took you to be reasonable too.

ArcticKnight didn't like that I suggested people going "is this a joke?" wasn't very helpful. Which it wasn't.

When you open a discussion, UD, you kind of want to set the tone if you can.
02-06-2017 , 05:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Okay, now explain what makes the sexist Ms POG different from "top 10 hottest guys in poker" or "Mr POG".

I understand that the argument is that I am a man and I can't understand(unless I'm one of those special enlightened ones). My argument is that they are the same because they are the same.
hopefully you really want to know why it's different. i mean you are actually interested in learning... i hope.

let's say a 2017 white man and a black make a bet. and the loser has to be the winner's slave for a day.

if the black man loses and the white man says "boy! fetch me a drink and shine my shoes!" do you see how it's different if the black man is the slave or the white man?

the exact same things are happening either way, just like with mr pog or miss pog. but there is a context outside of the game that makes things different.

does that make sense?
02-06-2017 , 05:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenjaminAO
Labeling my point at "oh the classic blahblahblah thing I won't even consider thinking about because it disagrees with my logic"

nice
No, I'm saying your point about women just being jealous of better looking women was a sexist and ignorant thing to say on your part. Not because you're sexist and ignorant, I assume, but because you have yet to realize the views you hold are abhorrent.
02-06-2017 , 05:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey Banana


I got "video not available" message on yours, but the one above works for me

      
m