Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Bridge Bridge

12-12-2015 , 01:23 PM
What else can you do but transfer to spades and plan to bid clubs later?
it is a bit early in the auction to think about anything else
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 01:30 PM
I assume it's MP btw

That does matter a lot here
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWetzel
I assume it's MP btw

That does matter a lot here
Yes. MP
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 02:06 PM
So ending in 5C is a disaster and if partner has club coverage we should still play 6S.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 02:08 PM
New plan if available: transfer to clubs and see if partner likes them?
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 02:22 PM
Thought about that but our system doesn't allow this - no way to play 4s later.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 02:41 PM
Yeah, that's a problem.

I think I'm OK with my first plan.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 03:03 PM
A lot of fun hands from last night:

1D (2+) - 1S
2S - 2N! (asking)
3H! - ? (4 card raise, minimum)

You hold:

K8xxx
AKJT
Void
AQ9x

Bids you have available:

3NT (Serious slam try, partner will cue bid his lowest control)
4C (Club control, skipping 3NT shows a non-serious slam try, but in the context that you know partner is a minimum, this still shows significant extras)
4N (keycard for spades)
5D (EKCB for spades)

If you bid 3NT

Spoiler:
Partner bids 4C, over 4D, partner bids 4S


If you bid 4C

Spoiler:
Partner bids 4D


If you bid 4N

Spoiler:
Partner bids 5D showing 1 keycard, if you ask about the Q, partner shows the queen of trump and king of diamonds


If you bid 5D

Spoiler:
Partner bids 5S showing 1 keycard, asking about the Q partner will show the Q and no non-diamonds kings.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 03:59 PM
If possible, 3NT followed by exclusion. If I hear a club control I can shoot for 7. If I hear no controls, or a spade singleton, then trying for slam will still be safe. the question is what to do if he shows a diamond control. I probably don't have exclusion available now, so I'm stuck with regular RKC... or am I?

If I don't have exclusion available after 3NT, I use exclusion now, bidding the slam if he has one key. (I don't ask about the queen.)
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 04:27 PM
5d has to be ErkC over 3n-4d -- what the hell else could it be?
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 04:45 PM
Thinking on this: the problem hand seems to be like

Axxx
Xxxx
AQJx
J

So it goes 3n-4c, 5d-5s, and over any further inquiry he will bid 6s. But I guess we need to distinguish from
AQxx
Xxxx
QJxx
K
Which is the nuts.
(4351s are the same concept)

You need pretty good agreements over ErkC. We play that the next step is a q ask and one over that is a king ask - I think this is a good agreement in all KC auctions (trump and NT to play where applicable don't count as steps obv). So here it could go 5n-6c 7s.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 07:15 PM
bid 6S - always playable and likely an excellent contract

partner could have the miracle with AQ of spades, Q of hearts and K of clubs but I can't find all of that - if partner has AQ of spades and the club K grand is still most likely a hook and not in the territory where I am happy to bash it

precision right ? - presumably partner is 11-12 unbalanced for "4 card support minimum" ? - I have never really understood what precision players do with the balanced 11-12 hands when they play a (12)13-15 1nt opening
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stripsqueez
bid 6S - always playable and likely an excellent contract

partner could have the miracle with AQ of spades, Q of hearts and K of clubs but I can't find all of that - if partner has AQ of spades and the club K grand is still most likely a hook and not in the territory where I am happy to bash it

precision right ? - presumably partner is 11-12 unbalanced for "4 card support minimum" ? - I have never really understood what precision players do with the balanced 11-12 hands when they play a (12)13-15 1nt opening
Precision is correct. 4 card minimum can still be balanced here. We play a 14-16 1NT opening, so he could have a bad balanced 11 here.
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc-ohio
We play a 14-16 1NT opening
I play a decent amount against a bunch of good career precision players - I think they all play 1nt as 12-15 but I would prefer protecting the integrity of my 1nt and 1C opening rather than trying to limit my stinky 1D opening so FWIW I like 1nt as 14-16
Bridge Quote
12-12-2015 , 11:43 PM
12-15 is kind of a strange range in my opinion. I've played precision with both 11-13 and 14-16 1NT ranges, and either work pretty well.
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWetzel
To play 4S as quickly as possible. Sorry if partner has AKxx clubs and the heart ace, they had a good save in 7D anyway.
i see there are still a lot of posts below this one, and i assume they're all lol'ing at you, but in case they're not, lol.
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabethebabe
What else can you do but transfer to spades and plan to bid clubs later?
it is a bit early in the auction to think about anything else
good question, what else can you do but transfer to spades and bid clubs (twice!)
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 01:15 AM
I would be surprised if a sim did not prefer 1N 6S to 1N 4S (as in, I think opposite a 14-16 NT I am >50 % to make 6S. This is especially true on a blind lead IRL where they might lead wrong).

But yeah no need to guess now, I sympathize with the view that blasting is better than searching for the perfecta slam with a lot of shape since it's more likely to help the opps get in if you go slow, but here I think slam is way too likely to make to take that approach.
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 02:53 AM
Here's another delicate auction from friday night...

R/W matchpoints

1C! (16+any) - 1H! (8-11 any)
2D-2S (natural, 5 card)
3C-3D
?

KJ
KQ
AQT75
K987
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 02:59 AM
Given how it is MPs, I can't see bypassing 3NT
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 03:53 AM
Why am I bidding 2D when I should be bidding 1NT

As played, 3s now. Since I did not support spades directly, this ought to show a doubleton.

3H 4th suit should be fine too, If partner bids 3NT, we pass, if not we play 4S or 5D.

3NT is just bad. I'd do that if I had AQ, not KQ. This stopper is too feeble to play NT oppositite a partner with 8+ cards in spades and diamonds.
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 04:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabethebabe
Why am I bidding 2D when I should be bidding 1NT

As played, 3s now. Since I did not support spades directly, this ought to show a doubleton.

3H 4th suit should be fine too, If partner bids 3NT, we pass, if not we play 4S or 5D.

3NT is just bad. I'd do that if I had AQ, not KQ. This stopper is too feeble to play NT oppositite a partner with 8+ cards in spades and diamonds.
Had a drink or two, yes this is more correct
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 04:27 AM
I think actually 3H is much better than 3S. If you bid diamonds, clubs and then support spades, you show a really feeble heart holding, while you actually have KQ.

3H sounds more like: I'm interested in 3NT, how about you?
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabethebabe
Why am I bidding 2D when I should be bidding 1NT

As played, 3s now. Since I did not support spades directly, this ought to show a doubleton.

3H 4th suit should be fine too, If partner bids 3NT, we pass, if not we play 4S or 5D.

3NT is just bad. I'd do that if I had AQ, not KQ. This stopper is too feeble to play NT oppositite a partner with 8+ cards in spades and diamonds.
2=2=(54) is not a typical shape for our 1NT here.
Bridge Quote
12-13-2015 , 11:44 AM
2D was fine, but how about 2NT over 2S? If all partner does is raise to 3NT it's right, if he wants to introduce clubs we can discuss that, we may get time to make a 3S preference. Really I see zero downside to it.
Bridge Quote

      
m