Quote:
Originally Posted by bhuber2010
This is the post that I remember was kind of wolfy (doesnt mean you are actually a wolf and I have seen some posts from you towards the end of EoD1 that I kind of like).
I just wanted to quote it before I forgot about it completely/save it for later if I have to re-asses.
The reason I thought it was wolfy is because it seemed you didnt actually care about Tappos/knew tappos role.
I thought thingy's case on tappo made logical sense (even if it was a very strong reason for thinking someone as a wolf + he admitted that he didnt think it made tappo a lock wolf).
+ This is also what I thought felt like you playing devil's advocate (meaning you kind of play both sides/nit-pick stuff that may be a little grey to appear like your talking.
____
Its kind of thin and I dont really think it makes you a lock wolf or anything (like I said I thought some of you EoD posting was actually pretty villagery). As the game progress and wolves arent dying, I might have to re-visit
i think i see what you're saying
i think the reason why my reaction to this was so polar was that up until then i had tappo as my strongest villager lean in that everything he was saying was not only villagery but also extremely coherent
then when thingy comes in with a case against my strongest villager lean that was backwards justified and quickly countered (again coherently) by tappo, it was pretty easy for me to pick a side
hope this helps