Quote:
Originally Posted by Thingyman
Meh.......
This is unambigous and should be a fake peek.
I just included this because the underlined is interesting.
Again, this is unambigous imo. This should also be a fake peek. So he's now spoken unambigously of Xkf = villager, me/Herbie = villager, ivers/Donk = wolves.
This would make it unlikely to the wolves probably that he peeked me/Herbie villager and his posts on ivers/Donkx4 in general would probably make it unlikely that he peeked them wolves. Wheras with Xkf he just makes one statement on him as clear villager and doesn't mention him again the rest of the day.
So meh, the Xkf looks the most peekish, but it's a horrible kill when he actually states 3 peeks. If Felix died seer, I wouldn't feel comfortable clearing Xkf.
I don't want to read anything into this kill, but the problem is that Felix wasn't clear by any means. So the wolves would have to be really stupid to night kill him (or the NK was randed) if they didn't actually think he was the seer.
I'll let my mason read all this and decide if we want to read anything into it. For now I will just be happy that Felix is removed from the thread's suspect pool.
That's a bad post.
Felix didn't leave three peeks. If the peek is a villager, it's always Xkf and never, ever Herbie/you. This should be blatantly obvious. If there's a wolf peek, it's Ivers/Donk, but the language is not as strong or peek-like as with Xkf. Saying someone is howling means that the person is wolfy, not that he's a lock wolf.
Xkf is SHC, as far as I'm concerned. I might be persuaded to reconsider if Ivers/Donk flip wolf, but not before.