Quote:
Originally Posted by tappokone
Why are you asking me to elaborate on my vote, but haven't asked everyone else who has cast a vote to elaborate on theirs? Doesn't make any sense.
...
You never got around to explaining your vote on me. I don't particularly care what your reasons were, but you should care about them and want to inform others. The exchange we had over my question to Timi felt like you wanted to arrive at the conclusion that my line was bad.
huge wtf @ this -
I need everyone to pay attention to what is happening here please
I am asking you to elaborate on your vote because 1) It is for me, and 2) You voiced earlier that you were "meh, whatever" on me and that you weren't interested in pursuing me even after I voted for you, and 3) Because I have taken great interest in you.
I ASKED you why you weren't asking me why I voted you, why you weren't asking me for an explanation. Your response to all this was that you weren't interested in me, even after my unexplained vote on you. You are now CONTRADICTING yourself by voting me for it a page later and saying that it is apparently wolfy/anti-villa of me to not explain myself. So which is it?????????? Is it wolfy or not???????
I just want to make it clear to you and everyone else what the progression of this was:
1) I vote tappokone.
2) tappokone asks timistere to explain his votes.
3) I ask tappokone why he isn't interested in having me explain MY vote, seeing as it was for him after all.
4) He answers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tappokone
I asked Timi because I wanted to improve my read on him and I figured having him talk about his reads might help. Your posting didn't interest me to the same extent.
5) To pressure him I tell him that it doesn't make sense (I am lying here, I can see why he would not ask every single person to explain their votes) and I ask him why he wouldn't want to improve his read on me by having me explain MY vote.
6) Again, he answers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tappokone
Thought process on Timi's start:
"Hmm, this guy is being very curt. I think I'll bold his name.
"He's still not explaining ish. I'll ask."
Thought process on your start:
"Meh. Whatever."
Makes perfect sense to me. The only way it doesn't make sense if you assume an automaton who treats every player and every vote the same, and who can't have subjective reactions to other people's posts. No one really behaves like that. At least not when they're villaging.
I give him several chances to straight up ask me to explain my vote, but he refuses to and instead goes into role neutral defensive mode about why he wouldn't which I then just choose to ignore.
Then on this page, suddenly I am getting a bit heat, and he jumps at the chance to vote me.
His reason for voting me: Because I didn't explain my vote.
Are you ****ing kidding me, dude?
tappokone
(I am not calling tappo a lock wolf or anything, but at the very least this is all very wtf and I want to pursue this further / pressure him further)