Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeper Service
IF A PERSON NORMALLY MAKES TERRIBLE READS THAT REVEAL ABSOLUTELY NO PROCESS TO THE READS HE MAKES AND THEN BREAKS OUT A LEGITIMATE READ THAT I'M ALSO MAKING AT THE SAME TIME THEN THAT MEANS I AM GOING TO FIND HIM VILLAGER-Y FOR MAKING A GOOD READ IN A GOOD WAY ABOUT THE SAME THING I'M MAKING THE SAME READ ABOUT
if you had said something closer to this from the beginning i could have saved myself a lot of words, because it's way less internally inconsistent (or at least apparently so) than the line you chose to take
but it still raises the question: have you had any experience with a monstr wolf game?* what basis do you have to believe that somebody suddenly posting "good" reads that reveal "good" processes is more likely to be a villager, other than the general heuristic that people who demonstrate that they're thinking about things more deeply are more likely to be villas? can you agree that there are players who put more effort into showing "process" and making "good" reads when they rand wolf than when they're villa? do you have a concrete reason to believe that monstr is not one of these players, even accepting your own premises?
*i think the answer to this question is yes for me even beyond FIFA, but honestly everything is blurring together at this point and my read on monstr isn't contingent on him deviating from an observed baseline on way or the other anyway