Yes, that's what I wrote.

top tier tom

okay, i am noting my post and your response, and now i am delving back into the annals of the thread to CHECK SOMETHING

i will return momentarily

vagos could be a woalf

haven't the foggiest idea what you are implying with the second sentence

Opportunism!!!!!

does that have relevance to his comments this game? serious question.

Can anyone tell me how this isn't a major contradiction?

Sure, that's why I switched it to "a distinct possibility".

cody, you have a lupine infestation in your treehouse club

nikes open reminds me a little of the WC game in terms of stating villa, and making a read right out of the gate, and he flipped villa, his commentary seems better this time around too (have no idea if his reads are correct tho) but this seems like to me nike is villa and is trying which is a good sign for he village imo

A scurrilous cur!!!!

It's not wolfy to defend yourself. It IS wolfy to be so over the top about it.

Sorry for the confusion.

FYI I just had a pretty amazing #conferencecall and I foresee a complete inability to focus on this for like 4 hours :P Also I will be AFK in that time anyway, mostly

Right, and then I bring myself back to my point of: No, it is not wolfy to hard defend yourself in any case regardless of how little suspicion you receive, to which we return to your response of

"Did I say you defending yourself is wolfy"

The answer to which is a resounding yes, because you yourself have admitted you think I'm being wolfy.

Do you mean ME?

PERISH THE THOUGHT!

Is it because I'm silly?

He means me, but it doesn't matter because as I stated before any domer post that involves "lol monstr is wolf" is getting read and commented on if necessary, but otherwise completely ignored.

Well he's voting for me so I must protect my honor

Somebody's pissed they are on the wolf list!

Maybe you don't notice that I'm trying to get XKF killed for lying about skype, but that's okay. Just vote him and I'll forgive you.

Normally I sleep through day one and come on and vote without reading because I'm up all night on Sunday. I'm assured that's super wolfy. Today because of the holiday I was actually around, and am assured that posting is wolfy.

Tom's posts about well named (and some context as appropriate)

okay, so

1) you start out by suggesting that well named would be your top choice as a wagon

2) you reinforce this by indicating that you're viewing iversonian's later post as potentially w/w with well named

3) then you say that well named "always seems wolfy"

4) then you have a list of wolf and villa leans in which well named doesn't appear

5) then you say that well named "sounds wolfy and insincere almost all the time" when he's villa

6) then you say you're not very familiar with his wolf game (despite having played in a recent game where well named was a very villagery wolf)

7) and then you elaborate on why you think well named comes across wolfy as a villager

so bearing all this in mind, i was wondering if you could complete this brief survey for me

• If well named sounds wolfy, then my conclusion about his role is that ____________
• I thought well named would be a good wagon this morning because ____________
• The way I would go about figuring out whether well named is a wolf is by ____________

your participation is appreciated

euro has gone quiet

When happyfish was a wolf in the last game, there were 0 posts from happyfish

suddenly like d2 showed up and there were posts from happyfish

conclusion: Happyfish is likely a villager.

yeah, probably best not to assume that Hax is a bad player, so he should revise his premises and conclusions accordingly

Domah, it's this thing:

so you call him out, that's fine ofc

i'm very much with you here.

and it's that rambling poast that takes 200 words to explain what could be done in ~a sentence that stops you in your tracks?

weird.

it's like: first Vagos said happy was lurking in a tbtbaw way. ok, that's fine, but that's also its own self-contained reason.

he goes on to explain that he has a twtbaw read because woalves don't usually hang around on d1₀ unless they're really confident blah blah blah. why tho? independently that's a fine reason to think somebody isn't a woalf, but I don't see why it's being used to justify the twtbaw designation he applied to happy's lurking.

i can't rly explain it better than that, hopefully it makes sense.