Quote:
Originally Posted by NotGonnaLie
Posts like this show you were really investigating the vote dynamics on day 2, but I never figured out exactly where you landed.
What takeaways did you have?
Do you think those posts really show a thought process of voting mechanics and dynamics?
Or do you think those posts show someone asking questions about something that is easily verifiable by reading?
To me they read like he is trying to confirm that specific actions took place.
For instance, lettuce break it down:
"Also there were 7 people on Myro so it's not like we have much info to discern who the potential wolfs were on him. I mean didn't NL try taking a wagon off of myro though when he was lead wagon? Onto xander right?"
- "Also there were 7 people on Myro so it's not like we have much info to discern who the potential wolfs were on him."
-- This is a statement and doesn't offer anything in the way of solving the game.
- "I mean didn't NL try taking a wagon off of myro though when he was lead wagon? Onto xander right?"
-- This is a question about how something took place that is easily verifiable. Where is there an attempt to solve anything?
Next:
- "Sorry that UFO onto xander not NL. DIdn't NL try and start a cfd tho off myro or am I mistaken? Please send halp"
-- This is another question about something that took place that is easily verifiable. Where is the solving? Where is the thought process?
These are just questions that look like an attempt to solve something.