Sun - posting a little more than usual it seems. solid posts
mets - people are so hard on mets.. and his posts have been ok so far.
VR - mets and some others said she seemed villagery. not so sure myself, but maybe.
gtpitch - as i mentioned above (being nice to noobs), and low content posts
well named - i mentioned him being confusing before, and others said that was his typical style. still have a bit of a bad feeling about him, but not so sure now. posts have some content at least.
sure, i can vote gtpitch for now (zomg woalf tell). I'm not too sure about him though, so i may change later on.
Don't worry, the wagons will probably change about 14 times before eod. My read isn't anything lock status either (don't read gtp too well and my d1 reads are usually teh suck), but it's the best I have right now.
remedys: how do you know sun is posting more than usual?
I've railed a couple games of his, and I've always thought of him as someone who doesn't post a lot, and will often show up late to games.
He says he's not posting more than usual now though so what do i know..
I think that's just a gtpitch thing and not necessarily a wolf thing tbh
Dislike this post, "THIS at least makes sense" could be pitch accidentally letting us know he's frustrated, and the "not necessarily a wolf thing" comment isn't really true. I have a decent record of reading pitch and that's part of how I do it.
The idea behind SHROOP is that wolves are super-conscious about what they say and thus preview their post, go back, reread it and change things that they think make it sound better. What happens is that sometimes it ends up not making sense in the end.
there's some threshold beyond which all these weird posts add up to me voting pitch for fabricating his posts
I was pretty bad on day 1 of that game, in which almost everyone else mislynched soah while I said don't (I was pushing the seer, on the other hand). On day 2 I went 1 for 2 on wolves, missing on Moocher (the seer, understandable). Then he claimed, so on days 2 and 3 I didn't do much because who cares. On day 4 the self-voting villager mislynch was inevitable so, again, who cares. Then on day 5 I put the killshot on binkles even though his spew and work was good, while 2 villagers failed to vote meaningfully at all and one actively frustrated any and all efforts to generate some sort of back and forth. That's like my WOAT game. I'll take it.