I don't think so, if you feel differently just spit it out.

why
why
why did you ask this? he's just going to say the exact same thing he said yesterday countless times & you are going to reply with the exact same reasons why it makes sense to do what you did. then he's going to say he doesn't understand & then someone else (not me, i've already said it enough) will say, yeah that's not as bad as he's making it out to be & then he's gonna say, well it's my opinion man.

sigh

I had a direction I was going to go, then I found out it was going to be Q&A and my pre-written posts didn't really fit that format.

Plus I was pretty baked

1. I can understand you being put off by me saying "I agree" without more comment.

2. You assume that saying "I agree" without more meant "I agree with everything 100%". This is an incorrect assumption, as I noted to you yesterday.

3. You also assume that the agreement in #2 was also in regard to the lack of information. There is now another layer of "and if" which you are bringing to the table, and this layer is even stranger than the first.

4. What was the way I responded, and how was it wolfy? As far as I recall, I requoted the list and blued the parts I agreed with.

Why though? Yeah, he's "gone hard" at a lot of people in the game, but there's no game-solving feel to his posts.

ianaww
never
kruze

charry
vader
zdye

gambit
bowens
jonny
tn
fnord
vaya

happy
smiglet
vix
mac

no order within groups

I don't understand why Charry or Kruze are there.

Zdye has been better than yesterday, for sure.

i'm about to go away again but i wanted to say

my feeling towards mac is this

he's not free flowing
he's not comfortable
his posts are very robotic
he's giving reasons but they feel wrong
like he's saying what he's saying to make it look right

i read him incorrectly every time but this feels weird...

the "gone hard" thing is villagery for him

i've agreed with ~most of what he has been saying too iirc



guess i'll have to re-read him at some point if he remains a top wagon

i explained the kruze thing yesterday... he seems pretty game-solvey. a few of his posts were hard for wolf-kruze to make

i didn't really like the way charry entered the thread yesterday, but he's been good since then.

also jmakin spew does look somewhat decent for him, even though wolf spew is overrated and apparently they have an ongoing feud

ya that sounds right

mcavoy

I find that there's a much more inquisitive nature to vader's village game, and i'm not really seeing that here.

Go actually reread him though

yea i will after i get some work done

k thanks

lock villa
iamnotawerewolf

Not foreseeably voting
TheNothing
NeVeR

Not ready to vote
Vaya
TehVader
Insanity
Kruze
jonnyd*
Bowens*

Could vote
Charry
Zdye724
vixticator
McAvoy
Fnord_too
gambit8888

Not Posting
SMIGLET
Happy_Fish

* bowens and jonny both trended up significantly today.

Though in all honesty, insanity, if vader's a wolf you look much worse in my eyes.

If mac's a wolf, you look better.

mcavoy d1 I picked a time when u were itt posting and I asked you why you had so many votes on you, you obv ignored it and are now lieing by saying I haven't tried to interact with you. Now u get lynched.

i dont see myself voting vader today. fnord or one of the non posters. maybe mcavoy

Actually, bump Zdye up to "not ready to vote"

Calling yourself a lock villa when nobody in the game is lock anything is extremly wolfy

does charry have it in them to go hard at a wolf teammate

Ok, IANAWW, here is the progession from yesterday (all in one post for you)



The original post that started this
You saying you agree with the above post. (I have stated many times already why I found this strange, let me know if I need to explain it again)

Here is me responding to you right after I noticed what happened
Weird response on your part imo. Not sue what "I only agree" means.

Here is me laying it out again for you

Maybe you should have said that the first time instead of just trowing out a "I agree with this post" post.
Sweet pic, made me laugh

After a while you take the time to highlight what you exactly agreed with. Nice, prob would have been better to do that in the first place tho.

Me pointing out that you highlighted less than half of the original post that you agreed with

This is where we seem to disagree. Leaving a persons name on a reads list and leaving it blank indicates to me that the person does not have a read on that person who is left blank.
Here is me explaining that to you yesterday
You highlighted what you meant after we already had a weird interaction where I thought you were wolfy. Do I think you are a wolf? Prob. The fact that you keep bringing it up and asking me to explain everything over again seems pretty weird too, since I already explained it.

it annoys people (not me, i put myself in my own villager lists all the time) but i dont think its wolfy

Sick post.