well, we can see by the results(at least somewhat, maybe we should look into sheep reveals) that the wolaves were not too obviously comparing answers, but i did awful and TN mentioned using a forum, i did to answer some questions as well so I was just assuming she was a villager doing the same as me
xpost with my vote.
No one with outside communication was allowed to collaborate on the sheep, so how would she play differently if she was a villager or a wolf?
OK, so Chris isn't answering my question. Here is why I asked: clearing TN for a non reason (her looking at the same forum he did = she's not a wolf, which totally makes no sense) makes me think he knows she's villa and is just looking for a reason to justify it.
I could totally go for a chris CFD here.
i answered your question, i was more or less just saying "Hey look, a weird answered (whatever the shield name was) and I matched with somebody!" similiarity, no idea why you are attacking me for this. wolaf points for you
do u understand my thoughts atleast? n0 rand isn't the same as a n0 action.. you aren't doing anything but being given a free rand peek.
u should be able to see where I'm coming from atleast.
i'm just saying...the OPs will say "N0 peeks will be randed" or something like that. I don't think it would say there are no actions but then rand one and send it out. I don't KNOW that of course bc i've never made a game or modded a game. i just really don't think it works like that. i admittedly suck at mechanics talk but i read it level 1.
you just bitched someone out for lying - when all he did was agree with 7 of 10 reads out of a list. i don't understand how you can be on his ass all day long about a list with 10 people = no reads that he agreed with.
i think it's crazy that you don't understand.
Originally Posted by Charry
I've played too many games with gambit lol.. he can post a lot as a wolf but I feel like he's 10x more nitpicky and ''not engaged to thread''
and i agree. i looked at his last villa game & he was VERY nitpicky as a villager then. i just can't get where he's coming from.
wolves weren't allowed to talk about it in wolfchat? i thought they could talk about everything?
where was this stated? you are hitting my wolfdar really hard right now, TMI posting imo
Considering it was in the rules, then commented on again, I am kind of incredulous you didn't know even if you didn't know it was the norm to not let wolves collude in game events like that. I think I was wrong about your TN post now, I think you were trying to derp clear yourself.