Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
No, that was a response to a different line of questioning. Adding another village lean on top of an existing one should strengthen the overall read, regardless of how thin it is. Having me below leo, who he seems to only barely have as a villager at all, makes no sense given his posts about me.
that's because with you all I had was a couple of very thin arguments, one of them being completely conditional (pushing bhuber) the other one being a very thin meta read (not being super serious early on) that combined were not stronger than my read on the players I put above you. that shouldn't be too difficult to follow at all, but let me just talk a little bit more about my leo read, since you're assuming I have 'only barely as a villager at all':
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardcoreUFO
y0 leo
I'm liking this progression on your read, but why did you retract, and then retract the retract?
this is my first comment to leo IIRC. he starts with a wolf lean on me, retracts, and then retracts his own retraction. this is textbook villagery for p1/p2 leans. it displays a suspicious/intrigued mindset, with leans that are constantly changing. it displays a thinking process similar to what someone that doesn't know roles would. do you recognise the difference? with you, all I had was a thin conditional read and a 'feel' of how you normally approach wolfing. with leo I had actual villagery thought processes.
I then got more skeptical of leo because I started to disagree with everything he was saying, but he also had other villagery moments, including 'calling everyone a wolf', when you on the other hand didn't have much going for. it's interesting that in your brain werewolf works like this:
"Adding another village lean on top of an existing one should strengthen the overall read, regardless of how thin it is."
when it's supposed to work like this:
"Not every lean/read/thought process has the same value. As reads evolve, thin early stuff will appear even thinner as the player collects more reasonable reads. The strength of an overrall read is only relative to the strength of other reads."
I think that's obvious for everyone who played more than a single WW game. and it goes back to you trying to raise suspicion on every word I write, when in reality everything you're saying here is not only incredibly thin and doesn't in any way, shape or form suggests wolfiness, but it's also all over the place and shows how your mindset at this point is to just raise every issue you can find until something sticks. the more you post about me, the wolfier you look, because you're blatantly trying to paint an image of what I'm writing here that simply doesn't exist. the irrelevant meta stuff, the 'circular argument', comparing my lean on you to bhuber's lean on you, saying my progression is senseless when every semi-competent reader would understand my mindset. it's all very forced and it only looks like working on the game. what you're doing here is working on a lynch. it may actually work, and I praise your effort, but it makes it clearer to me that you're in fact very very likely to be a wolf.