Quote:
Originally Posted by dbmurph22
Some sites have multiple players so I'd be interested in these players giving tips about their comrades (2+2, TL, BGG, etc)
I'm with TommyDanger who's a good chap. Tends to be fun-loving, very involved (though may take time to getting up to speed over here), theatrical, and fairly brazen with his thoughts. Pretty logical, but can easily get false positived because he tends to always have too much assurance. Usually his activity gets by this though and it's in a good natured way so I wouldn't say it's lynch bait.
Not easy to catch evil Tommy, but I think evil Tommy is assured through and through. There's a little hole in good Tommy deep down there that says "what if I'm wrong." I think that's the main difference. Pretty typical though in finding evil players though overall.
This is a neat idea. I like it. Of course, I'm horrible at reading evil-Murph so it's probably not useful to hear what I say.
The main thing to take away from Murph is that he is a creative player. Most of his plays go a level deeper than meets the eye. He is not "by the books" at all, which works to his advantage when he's evil and can be a real pain in the ass for evil when he's good.
I echo the sentiment of Murph being involved, good-natured, and quite a hilarious fellow with his offbeat brand of humor. But he'll do this as either alignment. I haven't found any glaring "this is good murph and this is evil murph" kindof things. I feel like evil-Murph is more quick to cast wider nets of suspicion to keep good's level of doubt high, but I'm not sure if that's actually true or not.