Quote:
Originally Posted by BLFG
No, it's not. It's correct. That's not the point of my argument.
The point of the argument is that proposing a no-lynch should never be done in the first place. At worst (if people agree -- even if no-lynch was the correct play for town) you get people into voting for no lynch and it gives mafia a free pass into not contributing anything because they know town will be no lynching anyways. They are safe.
I don't want mafia to be/feel safe. I want to confront people about their arguments that make no sense to me. It's not the matter of if no lynch is right or wrong, it's the motivation behind the suggestion. I do not see town motivation behind your suggestion. Unless there is something you havn't said about your motives behind it. You should speak if there is some.
While it is noble to want mafia to not feel safe, I've seen the other side of the coin and leading a lynch on you only to have you reveal that you are a villager narrows down the list for the werewolves to hit the doc and cop.
I understand we are wasting time on this, I get what you are trying to achieve and say. I was already willing to lynch on the first day as I am now part of a new group and it seems as if people are committed to finding scum on the first day.
I've mentioned it's a different environment for me, discussing the no lynch issue any further is not going to benefit us as I may not even go in that direction and I am depriving us of real scum hunting