[QUOTE=UncleDynamite;36711507]
I do not think that Hardcore's post is villagery, so I find Hoya suspicious for giving him an early village lean for it.
Or Hoya might just have fallen for it, as I said above.
That's what I mean by the w/w comment.
In fact,
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDynamite
Huh?
I wrote that Hardcore's post might be roleneutral or wolfy. I am yet unsure which of the two is this.
Since I do not think that post is villagery, I am suspicious of CPHoya's reaction.
This is wierd- like wolfy wierd or brainfart villagery wierd. not sure wich yet.
First off, im not liking the read on hoya. The post may not have been villagery, but the part that hoya focused on was (or at least it's plausible that hoya would think that is was). If you feel that hoyas villalean was out of order, it still does not explain your w/w comment in the top qopte.
You do not find the post villagery : I can dig that, neither did I
You do not think that hoya can justify his post: I disagree but w/e
If you find a post wolfy, and someone else giving it villalean for no reason, you
should consider it a possible w/w interaction. This is due to the below situations being ruled out:
If the original poster (ufo) was a villager and the second poster (hoya) was a wolf, then the wolf would try to incriminate the villager instead of giving him villaread.
I dont think you can justify ruling out w/w on that part.
Please explain if I misunderstand something