both vagos and CDL come off sketchy right now

has CDL explained his actions?

pretty sure vagos said he'd bbl

===============

acceptable SHATS imo: cdl, confirmedtroll

also agree with hurp about boo, but i wouldnt shoot him right now

gonna assume this meant mitigates lol

also reading back over CDL's posts he is posting whatever the **** he wants, so prob villa imo. CDL wolfpoasting = careful, guarded

wtf

yeah pretty sure he said he was taking off for a bit

and Euroa, above is an excellent reason why nuts hot is always a great SHAT

I can't remember the last time my team won a ww game

It might actually be Transformers

i went back and looked at where the posts were. Gad asked about the prize bottom of the page & Vagos responded top of the next page so I get that you could have missed that. But it was still weird. it was talked about for an entire page after that.

mil´i`tate a`gainst´
v. t. 1. To argue against; to cast doubt on; - used in reference to facts which tend to disprove a hypothesis; as, the absence of a correlation of budget deficits with inflation militates against any causal relation between the two. Opposite of support.

imo

insanity why you wanna shoot me?

Confirmedtroll must love the amount of heat he gets on every single d1.

you're pretty wolfy

I think vyk has been wolfy

(cue insouciant gif in 3, 2...)

yeah

this is ridiculous

1. w/w, but that's probably a terrible play.

2. To build up street cred in making good reads when holdem "unexpectedly" turns up dead early on.

I'm not even sure it means anything at all, but I think it's rare that binkles would pull a 180 like that so easily, and I thought it worth remarking on since nobody else had.

explain.
when / which posts

are there any bros here that wouldn't have used the shat in less than 5 minutes?

i see/fail

so much for autocorrect hypotheses

i m pretty wolfy to the point im a shoot candidate with a guy being posting weird stuff. and i have posted like 15 times

there is no one else in those 1556 posts who are been "wolfier" than i have been. lol_you if so. what kind of agenda are you having

all of them

I would have taken the approach I recommended to Vagos -- waaaaaaaaay more helpful info that way

you didn't, though. let me refresh the entire sitch here brah

I quoted your list of "decent SHATS imo", which was clearly an attempt by you to contribute to the game in a situation of reasonable leverage (dayvig choice) and asked specifically why you included zero-poasters nutshat2 and xxsooted, but left off tchaz. a perfectly good explanation would have been "woops, missed him".

you said:


so your list which originally was decent SHATS has now turned into "decent SHATS who i've played a game with". why?

you're welcome to poast whatever you'd like, but when you give your opinion on who should get dayvigged and later upon somebody questioning said list you respond with "it wasn't meant to be serious", it's ghana get noticed

except your explanation contains a terrible thought process that points to one time you caught a woalf doing the same ****

lol this entire thing but especially bolded. Why is it better to take a shat at a zero-poaster now instead of somebody we actually have data on?

I imagine I would have surveyed/tested the waters for maybe more than five minutes, but I wouldn't have left.

do you remember one in particular?

i try to talk good

also Euro is villagery