I had some other things to say about this game but they were mean and I don't care anymore. I don't know how we managed to win it after so much aids happened in the game.

I think a bunch of people deserve the villa MVP spot. I locked in the remaining three wolves + caught variance + helped the effen wagon, but I sucked in the mechanics of the game and ended up thinking boo and dwetzel were wolves. I also sucked at clearing kruze when he was such an obvious villager.

loose played it great. CT probably mvp for being a pretty unlikely villa captain and still leading the village to a win (plus making sense when most people weren't). overrall vyk had sick good reads and I was screaming for people to listen to him because at some point during the game he was the only one actually able to understand what was going on.

OFC a bunch of villagers played great because all the remaining wolves gave up. we still had a huge amount of aids because people just can't listen to obvious villagers with a plan. you should NEVER spite vig a guy, and that's what DWetzel did. like you have the clearest player on the game who is catching wolves like pokemons and he is hardclearing hold'em, what are the odds you're right and he is wrong? this is a team game br0. also wtf at saying you don't regret it? if he should be banned from WW or not is something to be decided inside of games. don't vig the guy because you think he doesn't deserve to play ffs. seriously have some respect for all the other villagers working on the game and trying to win it. if ash doesn't peek silman that vig would NECESSARILY mean we lose the game. why would you even think of doing that?

and I know ash is not going to read that cause he quit WW or whatever, but if you know nothing about standard game mechanics don't go on call people wolves because they do. also goddammit can you be more arrogant? getting everything wrong and STILL not thinking you might maybe be wrong and you should maybe listen to other people. ugh.

I'm not gonna talk about kruze and hold'em because I already wrote a lot. this game tilted me beyond belief and I almost took a long break from WW because of it and all the players that tilted me were actually villagers heh. it wasn't fun to play at all.

oh last thing: loosh, , but in the future pleaaaaase check with more experienced poggers if you're balancing the game well. this certainly wasn't really well balanced at all (although for some miracle the village won).

well that's it. gg willage, lol wilves, lol neutrals

Just for the record, I shot BJL thinking he'd flip wolf. Obv I didn't think RT would flip wolf and I was dumb to not NK DarO in that spot. I really did think the last wolf was in tchaz/CT so lol @ me for completely abandoning my d1/d2 wolf read on RT.

I take all blame for neutral NK's. Neutral chat vig discussion was basically this:

If all I post in every game is "I ****ed boo radley's mom last night" over and over, I can also create an indistinguishable meta. That doesn't make it acceptable not does it mean I'm attempting to play a team game to win.

what did i do that was behaving poorly.
somebody needs to clarify if we are going to keep talking about it.
saying i was trolling and behaving poorly doesnt cut it.
what specifically did i do wrong?

This sums it up pretty well.

Don't take Boo seriously. He's comparing Kruze in this game to someone who posts one emoticon.

Also, should go without saying but I called a lot of people idiots and came at people pretty hard late in this one (LK probably most of all), obviously just part of the game. Didn't mean to offend anyone.

I post the amberheardfallingintopool.gif in most games. I should probably self-ban for derailing so many games.

i put you on ignore and youre a villager 7 out of 10 times anyway (or whatever it is)

kruze is spazzy. i would vote him off d1 every game, but people dont want to do it.
same with people claiming wolf. people like to make a deal about it, but they wont vote them off. ridiculous.
somebody claims wolf, you vote them off. problem ends.
these 'problems' people are crying about can be policed in game by the players. banning somebody for having fun in a game meant to be fun is dumb

imo yep

i hope my wagon d4 can show some folks that you shouldn't lynch someone for a perceived "slip" than an entirety of 4 days of posting

i mean... unless someone is REALLY REALLY good, like soah level good, that's a hero play that just shouldn't be attempted.

I won even argue that shooting Holdem was a terrible play from a villager pov, but I was 1) not nearly as sure as others that he was a villager (I did ask a couple times why and didnt get an acceptable response), and 2) so tilted by him that if he was around I was not going to be able to play. I seriously considered subbing out and letting a sub come in and do whatever, I was just that tilted at that point. I am sure I missed a bunch of stuff during that day just because he was being an insufferable ******* and a huge distraction.

lol i had zero potential to be upset there. either you're a wolf and duh, you were a wolf or you're a villager and you're probably apologizing profusely. lol

damn

dont post, get modkilled

still not the worst, or second worst, or third worst player in the game

LOL BOO
LOL KRUZE
LOL HOLDEM

or maybe not DUCY

Well there goes Holdem's entire method of wolf hunting.

Dar0 is a huge part of the reason I was alive at endgame. If he doesn't hurt your credibility there I can't ignore you after I killed you.

no, you were the worst

after i died i was furious that nobody was reading effen for spew or me for any ideas. village spent ALL DAMN DAY yelling at each other instead of doing rereads. Which, effen completely spewed kruze clear btw.

nobody is going to point out what i did bad because once they do, i will show examples of 10 or more others doing the same thing
lol
gjge
as i said, gg all, thanks looshe

nope, you're always the worst

It's because we already know what you're arguing back with. Tweedy already covered it with his sarcasm above. Your argument is not a valid one, no matter how bulletproof you think it is.

You are a net negative for the game; there's little doubt about that.

.

No, you're an empty seat taking up a villager role and thus unbalancing games. There's a difference.

I do very much agree with you that policy lynching him in games he appears in is wise. Not having to do that is better though.