Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Tanner
Going to have to go point by point on this one I think:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Richard Tanner - please talk more about neutrals. No, really, please do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
Don't be an ass dude, if we're down to one wolf and one neutral (even if it's two wolves and a neutral), we need to find both. No sense in ignoring one or the other.
No, you're misreading me. I actually *do* want you to talk about neutrals to me (in that post).
[quote=tchaz]
Both RT and vyk quickly denied that
they are neutrals or serial killers, each on the ground that they would have done it a whole lot better. However their reasons for this are a not completely perfect imo. [quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
This is wrong. I don't think I've ever denied there was a neutral. I've talked about situations in which there may not be one, but have never said we shouldn't consider it or denied it outright.
Again, you've mis-read me. I say *they are* not *there are*. I mean both you and vyk deny being neutrals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
Can't really tell you without looking back over it (It's been like 6 real life days since some of those kills lol).
I will say, as we've neared endgame, I've had a really hard time understanding the SK's kills.
I would think they'd want to be taking out our clearest villas so that we are more likely to mislynch people (helps them win LDO). They've taken out people like Hardcore and BJL which doesn't add up to me. Hardcore was villa on most lists but Ash was nearly lock clear by virtue of being a seer. Even if you don't care about the seer (Neutral probably peeks villa) you'd want to get rid of a 99% clear person. BJ was at least a decent chance to be the lynch today, why you'd kill him I have zero idea. Let him live and be mislynched imo.
Minor point: BJL was a wolf, so he wouldn't have been
mislynched.
But there's no value in killing Ash for a neutral lone SK here. He's not making new clear players because he's either peeking wolves, who we then lynch, or villas, who we are paranoid are the wolf gf. (And as you say, a nSK probably peeks villa.) And Ash wasn't really clearing villas through making a circle of trust itg.
Besides which, why waste a kill on the seer when you ought to get help from the wolves to mop up the outed villa seer? If you kill the seer they may kill some terribly wolfy villager instead of you chosing a Hardcore and them having to kill the seer.
(Obviously in this case it looks like the wolf team fpsed the seer situation, but my points still stand. And you can still eventually kill the seer if you really want/need to.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
When I was the SK: 1 NK, 1 Peek, 50% chance NAs fail to hit me
I've also seen: 1 DK, 1 Peek, 2 lives, Can give another player a vig each day, Can't be killed until f11, etc. etc. (obv not all those were on the same character).
In short, it's pretty random but you can be pretty sure it's at least the DK and a peek.
Thanks - that's pretty useful for me, at least.