why would ashington be still alive unless he is not a villager?

i'm not ready yet to say ashington is a wolf because he isn't being wolfy really. but how can he be the seer? just doesn't make any sense

I agree. If he is a villager, leaving him out for another day risks him peeking another wolf. Would be a very bad play on their part.

welp

let's see who dies

shouldn't take too long

1) I'm a villager
2) If DWetzel and I are both wolves, listening to captain vyk who was advocating killing me earns DWetzel huge credit

aaccobra, gimme ur top 3 try hard people that isn't u

Try hard people, what do you mean by that? My top three village leans?

why is there a #2

Because #1 alone isn't enough, only I know I'm a villager.

I'm voting for people who vote me today. that's how I roll
if nobody votes me, cool

Can you answer my question please.

If he is the SK, how has he provided us with three exact peeks, including wolves? Is it common for SK's to be full seers as well?

Oh well.

Go ahead, lynch me. But try to plan the rest of the game today under the assumption that I'm a villager, because that's what I'm going to flip.

And stop listening to vyk.

HardcoreUFO is a neutral, if there's a SK it's him. I believe that TN was spewing truth though when she said there are multiple neutrals.

Silman is the vote today, though, he's a vanilla wolf.

No, it isn't. I'm not the SK. I am the village seer. Hardcore is trying his best to lead this village off a cliff.

Which of the two deaths is because of you?

And holdem will hopefully learn when that happens that being a giant bag of dicks to people doesn't just rustle wolves, it rustles people who are trying to actually play werewolf. At least you have that distraction removed.

Why don't you tell us, fancy play boy?

Now this I agree with. Vyk and Hardcore likely the neutral team. Once silman is gone and maybe BJ the wilves team is probably eliminated.

I would have thought it was obvious, but I shot holdem.

You're welcome. Unless you're not a villager, in which case **** you, but I mean that in the "well played, *******" sense and not the "I genuinely hope you get hit by a bus" sense.

Hardcore on ignore for the rest of this game ldo

Ok. That answers my question. DWetzel said really early on, well before vyk07 started pushing him to kill me, that he was going to take a hero shat at Hold'em 07.

I understand #2, that's what I'm saying.

it outs both, it's a bad play imo. dwetzel could've gained some credit for shooting you (although not a lot of it) and he went hold'em instead... let me think.

if accobra is a wolf:

1) dwetzel decided to kill hold'em instead because he still has some outs.

2) accobra might be a somewhat important role for the wolf team, therefore getting one or two more nights is important.

3) he didn't think it would actually spew accobra wolf.

tbh I think 3 is somewhat unlikely, 2 makes sense.

now... if accobra is a villager, that means there is no neutral SK. fact. dwetzel just kills accobra, accobra flips and he goes 'oh well i did what vyk told me to' if there is a neutral SK. why? because then outing yourself is a BIG mistake. it means we're at 7-5-1 or something, and dwetzel would lose a spot as possible late wolf to try mislynching accobra. with the SK alive killing wolves, reaching parity won't be easy.

so what we get from this is:

if there is a neutral SK around, accobra is a lock wolf.

if the dayvigs are controlled by wolves, accobra is a lock villager.

i think that makes sense.

So then why would the wolves kill Bryant Reeves over Ashington?

Ask them post game. This is probably the dumbest bunch of **** I've ever been involved with.

Role-appropriate lolcats for your pleasure:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDF71LjRB34