he is in the subthread at the minute the mod says that the mod announces itt that the participants has to stay in the sub thread and pm was sent.
1) he was either lurking and not posting for a long time then jumped in the subthread, snapped vmf, came back ITT said "hey guys i snapped VMF im gonna play nintendo"
2)he was informed in wolfchat and his strategy was given there. this makes 1million time more sense, +kruze making long posts in the subthread, playing "optimally" etc.
Fact: he knew about the subthread and decided to not post ITT. Inference: he was briefed by wolfchat
LOL AT ME. i FINALLY have an answer for this post i was called out for "lying" about.
the reason i said RT and VMF aren't w/w is because RT sniped a vote on VMF at exactly 8pm after being away from the thread for 90 minutes when the wagon was 10-8 sooted. i thought wolf RT never did that to wolf VMF...
BUT THEN later you will see how i realized that VMF hadn't placed his OWN separation vote yet onto sooted so it gave that "never w/w" read far less weight because the wolf team would still have that extra vote for separation. I said so RIGHT HERE:
so i did have a reason. and i did have a reason to retract the statement. it's amazing what a reread will do for you.
locks to not be wolves:
As lock clear as you can be without actually being lock clear:
fairly confident he isn't a wolf:
one step lower but still relatively confident:
leaning SLIGHTLY villa - a special note about this category, it's ****ing HARD to start looking more villagery on d4 than you were in previous days. it's much easier to establish high and then do your best to avoid a freefall. these three players are looking better:
enigmas/could go either way:
people i would like to see lynched: