in thenothing's delusional little world, getting 1 read wrong does not only override a proven record of having good reads all game, but a lone eod vote on someone implies direct causation to a non-villager's day vig shot
this is DWetzel making terrible seer cover D1 after kruze fakepeeks CDL. I'm gonna be ridiculously biased here because this is exactly the kind of thing I'm very comfortable doing as a wolf, and I think me and dwetzel have approximately the same experience wolfing.
what's wolfy about this:
first of all, he is 'creating seer cover' for someone like kruze. if he is a wolf, he knows CDL is not a wolf and therefore he can 1) hide himself on the formed CDL wagon over the excuse that this is his peek. 2) get a free pass at appearing villagery 3) get an early mislynch and 4) get himself out of seer contention early so he doesn't have to worry about this. OF COURSE no wolf thinks about all those stuff when fakepeeking someone, but those benefits in creating purposedly bad seer cover early are still in the back of his head wether he consciously has that thought process or not. as a villager why would he create seer cover for kruze? and also give kruze a villa lean for it... seems like he is doing a mechanical play to have TWO leans and not having to explain any of those.
the second thing that makes this a wolfy post is that he is giving kruze a villa lean by itself. if you're creating seer cover but you're not the seer, you just don't do it. you don't do it as a seer either, or maybe you do but you don't say why ITT. but the main point is you would only actively read kruze as villagery for fakepeeking CDL wolf if you are not interested at all in finding wolves. that's not how villagers play. villagers are skeptical, they're trying to solve the game. wolves are pretending to do that. that's a post that pretends to solve part of the game while not doing that at all, and none of this has anything to do with creating seer cover (because it's WOAT seer cover anyway, dwetzel is better than this, and he is making ridiculous conditional reads that he shouldn't ever as a villager).
I know I'm pinpointing a single post. I might do more stuff on dwetzel later. he has been on my wolfdar for a while now, his participation is low but that's ok, but he made other wolfy posts yesterday IIRC. I'll go to them soon (don't wanna make huge posts that nobody is going to read).
so far my 'serious' reads:
disagree, there's really no difference between fakepeeking someone wolf and reading them as wolf (unless you do the eod "if I die tonight turbolynch xxx tomorrow" fakepeek) same accountability etc
and leaving cover isn't really villagery imo. like it's not something I'd ever give villa points for.
why would a wolf want to be removed from seer contention? it means you can't fakeclaim seer later. and it's not like he's a player where people will ask "hey why is he not dead yet?"
this I agree with
please do, I abhor trawling the thread looking for posts to build a case with but quite enjoy analysing other people's cases