somehow i skipped dar0s reply to holdem.
heres the post.

gotta br0
i cant just say he posted a bunch of fluff. doesnt have the same effect.
you gotta see it to believe it

silman, its time for you to make an effort too

it's making your case kinda tldr
like everyone fluffs lots
it's only when there's no good posts mixed in that the fluff is wolfy (ie fluffing instead of posting real stuff)
if someone is posting a lot
and some of their posts are useless
but they have good posts too
the fluff is fine
it's about how much good work there is
not what % of the posts are useful

holdem to forsy the waffle

waffle forsy to waffle holdem

nice little kissy kissy between waffle br0s, just like holdem pointed out between me and binkles, amirite?

silman, hunt some wolfves. enough commentary

silman
until he does something other than worthless commenting

eh I have been
today is my work day (work 2 days a week, just finished and have another tomorrow)
so I don't much feel like trawling through thousands of posts making another mq just for the sake of it
I've done plenty of that this game
but not today sorry
I'll just settle for calling your mqs bad :P

I didn't see this "I am needy fur you" (???) at the time. My swype doesn't autocorrect like that but ...

TLWTBALW ???

Big Country: srs pogness, y u no in db???
tchaz: <makes joke>
Big Country: wat
tchaz: <explains joke> , <gives requested info>
Big Country: lol, went right over my head. ty.
<BC goes away. Half an hour later>
Big Country: tchaz, I think you aren't posting enough fluff this game

errrr, rrrright ....

for some reason pog has decided it's cool to provide lost wolf cover
in my day we just lynched everyone who left signals
i guess it's not bad
since it did make a lot of mislynches to cries of "I wasn't signalling, really! it was coincidence!" and the like
also
haters gonna hate
silman's gonna commentate

and then vanishes
bjltnyk

to BR: Actually I'm pretty sure it is the same style.

You didn't quote the remaining posts I made that game - including 4/5 slabs of text that I had been working on and wanted to get into the thread before an ITA (I was concerned that I might get got as I had had some pressure for being afk the previous day - don't worry for now about how great a strategy that was). thedean -as a willage leader, lol - immediately called these wolfy, for what may be your concern/query. Check p29 of that thread (100ppp)

Just by chance people don't seem to be interacting much with me this time (when I've been around). Eg, Sat night zdye asked a q and then didn't answer back to my response, TN similarly.

So - tldr: it really is the same

happy boo?
also
in that small post
I made a better case than your entire walls of quotes of holdem

I have an unfortunate habit of tending to favour interaction with people I've played with lots
familiar faces make easy conversation and all that
but hi
I'm here
let's talk

fluff

straight troalling

this is me from d1, lest anybody think my recent vote for silman was out of the blue. and note i tarped duckberg(hardcore)

the struggling part was an attack on monte villager

the gad part was fluff

fluff

no vote for his waflle br0 here. strange.

attacking a villager

deflecting

attacking a villager iirc

tmi on insanity

end of pg12


im going to take a break now, but i have quoted all his posts through pg12. did anybody see any wolf hunting? any real ww posts? what, maybe 2 total if we are nice?
holdem should commence lolcats br0s

keep going br0

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/se...rchid=27888948
there's 64 posts here
most of them are bad

next level mq itt

for bonus points I'll do one on vmf too

says no matches?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/se...rchid=27888955
there are 70 posts here
most of them are bad

really, does linking searches not work?
how lame
there goes my pro mq

i dont know who the first one was on, but dont waste time on vmf.

dw it doesn't take long
or wouldn't if linking searches worked

monikrazy: I don't think you are necessarily a wolf, but those interactions you quote simply are not clearing for you imo. It's not helping you to keep insisting that they are.

For example the exchange where you supposedly caught Euro's supposed slip of claiming to be a vanillager and then claiming he wasn't a vanillager. Did you misunderstand and try to pester him in the thread on purpose in order to elicit a reaction? Or was that a simple misreading of what he wrote? You - imo - didn't get a reaction and you muddied the water, allowing him to concentrate on establishing something that he clear could establish (ie what he had written) rather than defend his claim, and confusing other players, notably Ash - a pretty clear villager now - who reacted in the thread as if he believed you had spotted a slip up. (I'm assuming his reaction wasn't sarcasm - I guess I could be wrong if he tells me so).

Whichever it was doesn't, however, address your motive. Given that you are finding or 'finding' 'slips' like this you could equally well be doing it as a non-villa as as a villa.

Arrogant dismissals aren't helping you either - you may be the best player in the game for all I know,* but unless you play on levels the rest of us can understand that won't help you.

*