whatever Euroa, if anything thinks that's a good MQ then they're clearly on drugs
you clearly couldn't be more uninterested in determining okse's role given how shallow / non-existent the analysis was. so you don't care / already know, and did that for spew reasons. or you're WIL'ing.
so what is it?
Henrik let me aks you:
what in your opinion is a MQ that one could be proud of? 30+ quotes? does there have to be 3-4 sentences of wordy analysis after each one?
to look at that and say it blows because i didn't reach a conclusion (i believe it was you that said that) is mindnumbingly ******ed. the conclusion was stated in my first poast of the day: "i think okse is a woalf"
but yes, here I am being called out by the dude who poasts vig lists that aren't meant to be taken seriously. additionally, you might consider placing a phone call to Kenny Loggins if i get lynched here because that 3rd-4th-man-on-the-wagon puts you squarely in the
yesterday you had me as a wolf, now i'm voating you and you're a top wagon, but you're trying to sluff me off. what gives?
approach me, friend0!
i've got very little concern for engaging you if you're going to come at me with specious semantics pile-on garbage about what does and does not constitute a good MQ
you see, i'm now in the unenviable position of potential mislynch who is forced to balance a defense of oneself with attempts to clear myself via woark, all while worrying about **** in real life. it's a bit of a struggle.