tchaz: you seriously don't feel like you're posting differently here?
seems like every post is some measured word bomb, and you're not interacting much
here's the other game...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
I guess a neutral win condition could be framed in terms of surviving either Fx or until the elimination of either village or wolves. A bit tortuous maybe, but I don't think neutrals are completely excluded simply by the announced win conditions.
'Too much mechanics chat to be credible' postscript: in the short mishmash that just finished on SE the f7 was 4v 1n 2w - with one v poisoned & no healer and villa with no kill other than the lynch. If (as wolves claimed itt) it had been 3-2-2 then n+w could have mislynched and nk-ed the villas, have the wolves win with their eliminate village condition, leave the game and have the neutrals win with their last men standing condition.
ok, opening mechanical word bomb, then
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Boo Radley
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
fyp
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Well, I suppose you had done your share of correcting. Vaya's post feels false to me - I was pointing that out.
"popping" - meh - the thread was slow and I was reading something else. This seemed worth noting when I looked at the thread again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
In a meeting - back just now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
No - first time. I expect to be pretty gullible and find it hard to read people's tone. Also too reticent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
lol (no)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
I didn't understand bobo's reasoning in #212 and subsequent posts at all. It just seemed confused. But this seems a good observation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
No - it's not a good case and I'm not a wolf.
I don't have the meta to make tone reads on people, particularly in the first 100 posts. So it makes much more sense to me for me to start by trying to pick up and think about details/oddities whilst I try to accrue better feel for the other players. (Fwiw playing feels/seems quite different from reading games I wasn't playing in.)
The neutrals win condition seemed like a good way of making a first post with some content. Many people have come into the thread and insta votes Boo - Shark himself did - for obvious reasons.
My post about vaya was in order to note that it was a strange thing for him to allegedly be think about who to target in ITAs whilst seemingly not knowing that they are only going to start tomorrow. I'm not sure that in iteslf amounts to vaya being wolfy, but I'm bearing it in mind.
Then I leave the thread for a meeting and shark starts tunneling. It doesn't make any sense at all to think that I'm disappearing under pressure given the paucity of what he's pushing with - if I had been around it would have been much simpler to just tell him he was wrong.
2nd word bomb
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Agree with this. So I should probably find someone else to vote, now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
thanks.
unvote
and with that I'm out again for a couple of hours
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
I'm back. Just spent 10 minutes trying to skim - that doesn't seem to work for me at all - I got no info except that Gad and Dean are having pretty interesting discussions in their own private thread.
I guess I'll try to catch up from mid page 6 whilst being at the ongoing end of the thread. Not sure how you do that. Should I F5 here every 5 minutes? More often? Less?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Shark - did you see my response to you at #492 ? Do you want me to quote it again for you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Not really liking pokerbobo's play - drop-in vote on me with no explanation after that response post together with the confused stuff about Gad-v-Dean mechanics. Hard to tell if he would really put the mechanics thing out there as a wolf though. So I think my lean is towards not-great villaging.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
OK, I'll take this as an opportunity to repeat what I said earlier
Shark's case
My response
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Ok, well, I don't think I can really add any more to what I said about what you're making out of those three posts of mine, so I'll leave it at that for them.
Also, lol@me for thinking I would be able to read on from p6 - can't even keep up with the thread whilst typing
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Yes - was this explained somewhere on p6-13?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Voted you, made a post, had a meeting, got tunnelled by shark, came back from meeting and responded, made some more posts - don't think you missed much tbh - but I did unvote from you because I liked you argument in #446 about disko, went out and got back about 45 minutes ago. Trying to keep up and post some answers since.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Can you throw us a # ? I'm really struggling to find my own post in real time even knowing roughly where they are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
noted
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Well I am eventually finding my own. Could you either briefly repeat/summarize the explanation or tell me where I can read it, please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
Thanks very much. I have just found your "truth isn't always persuasive" line. And have to agree.
and so on...
idk, feels a lot different to me
like so many posts of yours itg feel like you spent a bunch of time carefully constructing them, etc
am i nuts?
