11/15 NBA Mishmash Game Thread
11-17-2012
, 04:18 PM
11-17-2012
, 04:23 PM
11-17-2012
, 04:26 PM
11-17-2012
, 04:28 PM
Quote:
i wish PBAL were around so he could properly inform me as to whether or not it's villagery or woalfy to ask certain players to reread other certain players
afaict early he's commenting on the status of a basketball game but i wouldn't say that says much about him either way. he didn't after all make the bold claim that he was going to CHANGE IT UP.
afaict early he's commenting on the status of a basketball game but i wouldn't say that says much about him either way. he didn't after all make the bold claim that he was going to CHANGE IT UP.
Quote:
it's good of you to drop the act btw.
i don't have a good handle on how he played in Cinematic because i was dead by d2 and didn't pay much attention after that. i'm assuming he played a standard CDL game which is (imo) FPSy and toan-woalfy in either role.
Proverbs I remember he was relatively UTR early but then picked up a bit of volume later. i don't at all recall him using bolded, colored text to mimick game commands in either game
i don't have a good handle on how he played in Cinematic because i was dead by d2 and didn't pay much attention after that. i'm assuming he played a standard CDL game which is (imo) FPSy and toan-woalfy in either role.
Proverbs I remember he was relatively UTR early but then picked up a bit of volume later. i don't at all recall him using bolded, colored text to mimick game commands in either game
especially that drop the act comment
Quote:
you didn't, though. let me refresh the entire sitch here brah
I quoted your list of "decent SHATS imo", which was clearly an attempt by you to contribute to the game in a situation of reasonable leverage (dayvig choice) and asked specifically why you included zero-poasters nutshat2 and xxsooted, but left off tchaz. a perfectly good explanation would have been "woops, missed him".
you said:
so your list which originally was decent SHATS has now turned into "decent SHATS who i've played a game with". why?
you're welcome to poast whatever you'd like, but when you give your opinion on who should get dayvigged and later upon somebody questioning said list you respond with "it wasn't meant to be serious", it's ghana get noticed
except your explanation contains a terrible thought process that points to one time you caught a woalf doing the same ****
lol this entire thing but especially bolded. Why is it better to take a shat at a zero-poaster now instead of somebody we actually have data on?
I quoted your list of "decent SHATS imo", which was clearly an attempt by you to contribute to the game in a situation of reasonable leverage (dayvig choice) and asked specifically why you included zero-poasters nutshat2 and xxsooted, but left off tchaz. a perfectly good explanation would have been "woops, missed him".
you said:
so your list which originally was decent SHATS has now turned into "decent SHATS who i've played a game with". why?
you're welcome to poast whatever you'd like, but when you give your opinion on who should get dayvigged and later upon somebody questioning said list you respond with "it wasn't meant to be serious", it's ghana get noticed
except your explanation contains a terrible thought process that points to one time you caught a woalf doing the same ****
lol this entire thing but especially bolded. Why is it better to take a shat at a zero-poaster now instead of somebody we actually have data on?
im not gonna bother quoting the entire conversation since it's kind of inane but feels like bryant was bugging euro and he was being annoyed by it esp the last line
oh hello
just gonna stop with the bryant interactions and call bryant a lock villager and move on(nto a peek)
