Ok, so both Athexx and Nana were suspicious of DGB at the end of the day. Taylor was too, but less vocally?

One of these people knew they had to end up in Lylo with me and one other person. I cannot see Taylor being willing to let DGB into that. Athexx might. Nana might.

Thats where Im at. From a greedy perspective, the kill makes most sense for Nana I think. DGB was voting there and working with Traz on it. Nana has felt proactively protown recently and I thought I was picking up on some genuine confidence and eagerness which really feel town, but I'm going to reread nana as best I can.

The bit about not trusting lists when she clearly did earlier is a bit unnerving.

I am pretty shocked both that it isn't Traz, and then that DGB was killed.

I will be voting no lynch but I do not intend on voting at all until the end of the deadline in order to prevent the day from ending too early. If I end up in the final three I want to give myself as much time as I can to go over things, and if I end up being killed tonight I still want to give the two villagers in the final three as much time as well, including to try to get my thoughts in before that happens.

Athexx, lets do a little roleplaying.

If you were scum, who would you have NKd?

I'll go first: Taylor.

You don't really sound shocked tbh.

Its like one of those poorly written books where the author has to tell us that Athexx was shocked rather than showing us.

Taylor absolutely. Also if I was scum I would have voted for Nana yesterday and not been so insistent that she's good, because Traz did not seem to remotely question that I'm a villager (which by the way is one reason I continued being suspicious of him yesterday - I thought surely if he's really a villager, by now he ought to be suspicious of me just as I had lost my certainty in him).

And I still feel like Nana and Taylor both seem good. I've never really doubted either read from day 1. So now I either doubt both or question you too. Having mafia kill one of the four of us is pretty much required.

Actually I like your question, AP, and I want to hear responses from both Taylor and Nana:

If you were scum, who you have NKed last night?

And in addition, of the current four, who would you NK tonight? I'd like AP to answer this as well.

I would NK Nana, because AP just gave indication he would vote Taylor in that final 3.

Votes from post 4516 to post 4531
Night in 28:00:58
---

Votes	Lynch	Voters
1	no lynch	AngryPidgeon (12)
3	not voting	TaylorFitz (0), Nana7 (0), Athexx (2)

I thought Dripping looked pretty bad yesterday, Dripping's choice of list and assumption looked really arbitrary. The Mango list I had pointed to earlier was not arbitrary, I thought there was a story there.

If I were wolf I would think AP and Dripping a good pair for the final. If I were going for Taylor/AP though I'd have nk Dripping.

no lynch

No reason to complicate things

If I were scum I would have killed anybody but the person that just got killed. I don't think anyone else could make me look as bad as that kill just did.

Votes from post 4516 to post 4535
Night in 24:00:58
---

Votes	Lynch	Voters
2	no lynch	TaylorFitz (2), AngryPidgeon (12)
2	not voting	Nana7 (1), Athexx (2)

Taylor, your quick vote after I stated my own intention to wait to vote to avoid ending the day early, and lack of response/engagement does more to make me suspicious of you than anything else. I mean this is a pretty epic situation we're in; getting toward the final three in this game of champions here. I find it hard to imagine that if you're village, you're still not interested in putting in an effort to both defend yourself and figure out who the last mafia is.

Nana, I hope, and I think I'm correct since you haven't voted yet, that you intend on waiting along with me to place your vote.

And who would you kill tonight?

I'm sick of this game. I will not make another post after this until the next day phase because I'm sick of wasting time. One of us will be dead for the phase so what's the point in wasting time working out which of the 4 of us are scum.

So go ahead and waste your time trying to engage me. I just want to finish this ****, see who wins, sign out, and never come back here again.

I am not voting to end the day early. Someone could have a breakthrough moment. I have no ideas atm who the last one is. I like catching bad logic and inconsistency but nothing is jumping out at me.

Votes from post 4516 to post 4540
Night in 22:00:58
---

Votes	Lynch	Voters
2	no lynch	TaylorFitz (3), AngryPidgeon (12)
2	not voting	Nana7 (2), Athexx (4)

Hm. I know Taylor said he wouldn't respond but I just find this situation extremely disappointing. I would assume everyone who was invited to play this game is not just a "champion" but also a lover of the game itself and while there are lots of things about my home forum that I miss playing here, and this is also even a different style of roleset and such than I normally end up playing, I can't fathom how either villager or scum in this situation could be so apathetic.

Pretty much exactly what Nana just said - any one of the three remaining villagers here may yet come up with something today in the time remaining that, even if they die, will giving the remaining villagers help to figure out the scum on the final day. But obviously if we just ignore the extra day, then that's not going to happen. And if you really, genuinely, don't care about winning this game then that's hardly going to convince you, but I don't see what the point of playing is then.

Mafia only had two power roles, right?

Cop and Vigilante?

AP, why do you keep talking about a poisoner?

There's been no evidence to indicate there's a poisoner in the game at all.

Not sure if this link works for everyone, I just did a search on the thread for poisoner. We know DGB was a roleblocker, but it looks like there were only two mafia PRs, which almost doesn't make sense.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/se...rchid=34695107

I'm a bit concerned about the possibility of a poisoner existing. If there is, then we shouldn't be voting no lynch today.

The wolves had a roleblocker too, Devourer.

Rules questions I just pmed the mod as well:

1. Does a poisoner, unless told otherwise, get repeat uses of their poisoning power? Generally speaking that is, just asking clarification on the typical understanding of the role as described.
2. If a death is due to poison, will there be anything that would differentiate it from other kills in the flavor text?

Oh, right, okay. That makes it a bit more reasonable. Still, what also concerns me is that Mango was the first player to mention a poisoner, and AP's role claim mentions details of a poisoner, and he even brings it up again despite no other mention or evidence of a poisoner.

There's no point considering an unlimited use poisoner because that would be dumb for the mafia to have one and not use it, but a one time use? If so, it would be either AP or Taylor, as either Nana or I could end the day right now by voting no lynch.

Poison takes an extra night to work. And I think it would be odd to not have used it yet.