Seems like we're playing against a fishy player, with a strong bluffcatcher (equally strong in value as AK imo). We're short-stacked, barely at 50bbs, so 1-pair hands should be tougher to fold. There's a plethora of semi-bluffs to be up against too: KJ, QT, (Q9)/2, JT, (J9)/2, (J8)/2, (87)/2 for a total of: 60, all of which we pretty much crush (70%+). His value hands are TT, 99, K9, T9, so: 24 - against these, we're around a ~18% underdog (notice how I excluded QJ, BB rarely has QJ here on a donk-overbet - maybe like 2/12 combos?).
Although donk potting/overbetting from fish is a typical sign of a weak made hand at the micros, causing us to exclude a lot of his bluffs (say we're likely to cut them down a lot, maybe 60->20), notice how he's lost what looks to be 40bb within the previous 9 hands in what I assume to be some fishy action. He is clearly getting impatient, tilting, and is doing some sketchy stuff.
BTN seems way too passive, with similar fishy stats, so I'll give him a wide range that we _crush_ on this board. I expect him to play fit or fold against our call (we polarize him to QJ/TT/99/K9/T9 or nfd), making it easy for us to fold for the remaining $3.4 if he shoves on us. This is because there's 40 nutted hands vs. 8-9 nfds, I'll happily fold and let his only semi-bluff work.
AP flat flop, call pot bet on most turns. I'm happily putting in my 50bb against a tilted fish.
If anyone is able to deduct anything else but a "Seems like" off of a 9-hand history size and no further comments, I'd happily treat them to a beer any time
Oh, and lay off the sarcasm, it doesn't fit your nit short stacker style at all.