Didn't read the entire thread, just want to point out that this is wrong.

cool thread, could use a bump

^^agree

do not agree. That's like "average temperature of ill people in the hospital".

i read your post....you'r great really....

this my graph...i lose only on PS in cash game HU?

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg407...ng&res=landing
and that are my other graph on bossmedia

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg825...ng&res=landing
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg59/...ng&res=landing

you think that i had bad run or in PS the field is more strong and i can't win

what can i do for to improve in your opinion?

what kind of BR do you need for the NL200 HU?
and for the NL400?

tm;dc

too mathematical; didnt comprehend

still a poker player OP?

???

???

since the nature of poker changes constantly (people iron out leaks and work on their game) i find it hard to believe there is any way of quantifying true HU winrate, the very fact that it takes >1million hands to get a reasonably realistic estimation of winrate means that the game will have evolved (considering most of the best high volume HU grinders can get in around 60K hands in a month, and at higher stakes that number shrinks dramatically due to the bum hunt nature that has taken over in HU cash) ~ so the test is itself isn't a fair one, however i think that for a player such as nanonoko its more applicable since the games won't have changed as much within the timeframe required for the sample to be legitimate

I think you might be right, but I also think nell'HU you can not expect to have a sample of 200-300K hands, I believe that a winning player you can see even from 20K-30K played at the same level, because in the second HU me are sufficient, in that number of hands HU you can lose or win very much and I say we are a fair sample.

anyone know if masterLJ is still around? remember him being the reason i got into HU poker, was the first video i ever watched on cardrunners