agree that this thread is a bad idea, mainly because i assume there are ton of lurkers

but aslong as this thread stays on its present course, im all for it

Man that clip never gets old

oh wow that is sooooo dick lmao

NARCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

i personally have a gigantic problem with sweat sessions where the coach makes all the decisions on the students' accounts. there is obviously nothing i can do about it, but if the idea is to have a session where the coach talks to the student about their play, then they don't even need to do it in real time. however if they did it in real time, they could refrain from actually giving advice mid hand. if the idea is to listen and learn from how the coach would have played, it is possible (though not as easy) for anyone to get a game at any stakes. so the coach should just play on their own account. i'm against anything that allows for one person making decisions on another person's account, and anything that allows for any deception about who is playing on any account. in large part the reason for my disapproval of such practices is that they are not avenues open to all players. if they were, i wouldn't have as big of a problem (as well, if they weren't (lol) against the rules. (and yes, i know the one player to a hand rule is both unenforceable and not even a rule on some sites.)

that said, while i don't agree with what DiH and cftw did, i do feel like jeff is being a bit of a dick/moron.

That report just took this thread completely over the top.

And that link is basically the best thing ever.

I misspoke. Internet Pokers didn't play every hand obviously. He just discussed theory with me. The only reason I phrased it the way I did was because jeffmet3 was acting like I was making terrible mistakes when IP agreed with most my moves and just made tweaks here and there and discussed his theory behind it. Having a coach just play for you doesn't make you better; it's him sweating. I played the hands, but he saw no fault in how I played in most spots and in spots he did, he told me about how to change it.

The only reason I phrased it the way I did was because Jeffmet came on as a belligerent jackass and then evolved into a walking vagina.

I freaking love this thread.

This thread is A+

I think I'll come in daily and say "lol" at this egofest we call a reg thread.

this thread is dumb cause regs never play each other. I honestly dont know how any regs play. Oh well. Ricky_travel is obv very good.

X

I think it would be a good idea if someone made a software where you type a person's nickname and get a .jpg where his nickname is written. You can then make any post, and no one can google their nickname and find this thread.

All you have to do is to type Villain =[img] blabla

I don't know, I guess it will be better for everyone. I think this kind of software might be even free, just match letters with jpegs and combine. I could do that I guess.

lol

Christ ruggedman at ****ing 8 1/2 tables by himself

all the regs are nits

agilitybob always puts nice ones on me.

i stopped playing agilitybob, he is a cooler machine

Gud point, or people could actually use abit of common sense and block out 1 or 2 letters of villan's alias. You just need to look at SSNL/MSNL regs thread to see how many ppl join just because they "googled" their username and found threads where 2+2ers where shouting about there leaks or badmouthing them in general.

what do you guys think about O_A_A_A, Hasu_Ninja, I_BEAT_YOU_6, gopheresque?

first guy is pretty terrible, last guy is good. plays a ****load of tables

Kaintd will not play anyone, and I mean anyoneeeeeeeeeee

OAAA & HasuNinja suck, gopher is v. v. good

Thoughts on Urindanger, trex & OMGClayAiken ? seems that they are blocking my 3/6 tables for a while now

any2 knw of this guy probowla48 at 50nl ftp, what u think of him?