Hi, we are 2p2 HU Forum. We play like tagfish all the time and dont consider our opponents thought process at all.

Screw it i quit.

I like how you played it.

Like I said, I was quitting either way because I was finishing up. Sucks for you that you donked off your stack in that one hand and, like I said, I have a hard time feeling sympathetic for anyone that talks trash at a table.

It was our first hand. Great that you had such an exceptional read on me in based on two streets in that one hand to think that was a good play but, well, it was pretty horrible. Once you raise that turn, I'm only continuing with hands that beat you or what I had. What were you hoping I'd call your raise with? 88?

Also, LOL at calling with confidence. You looked at the board and there was a card on it that was similar to a card that was in your hand and then you saw the call button.

I honestly just assumed you were playing drunk.

Thats what all of my opponents do, apparently I gotta stop bluffing fish on the river.

More naismith up in here!

u gotta admit naismith has a way w words

HU4rollz match brewing...?

poast more?

ummm you got him to put his money in when he had a FD, 2 overs, and a gutshot when you were repping nothing.

...you happened to have middle pair that you played terribly.

not sure how you can call anyone a TAG fish when you played a hand like that.

yeah but he called with confidence

plz k thx?

Naismith, I expected you to shove your draws since there were a ton out there. If you had a K oh well gg me. I only talked trash to try to get you to stay...wasn't meant to be personal and I know you didn't take it that way.

Pasterbator, me repping nothing is a good thing. And reaction, being able to call with confidence is a good thing as well...otherwise I wouldnt have raised.

Whatever it doesnt matter I'm done with the convo I'm happy with my play and defintely think he shoves with tons more than just AQcc.

yeah i just couldn't resist the needle or w/e

one step down from an aggressive call

hahaha i love the capser naismith hand it looks like each player was trying to hit and run the other

yyesssssssss yessssssss

funny thing about that hand is that kasper completely leveled him and played it very badly. good times.

Casper you played your hand so bad... 1st he had 37% equity so he basicly needs just a little fold equity to make a profit with his shove.

Also do you think that you could play a set like that? No way you would just bet the turn instead of some ******ed check rr on turn which doesnt make sense. If you have a strong hand you would charge a draw a lot cause you know with flush draw or straight draw he might check back. But since you made such a move which didnt make sence he shoved.

So you played it very bad and hes move was ok giving the circumstances

casper try using poketstove yo

See, this is my problem with your play. You haven't played me before and had no idea what I would do this with. The truth is, my shoving range on the turn (playing with 100bb starting stacks) is limited to basically sets, two pair, AA and pretty much this exact draw. Obviously, that adjusts based on the particular player, but I knew nothing about you.

With AQcc, though, I don't really need to know much about your game. I obviously didn't know you were a 2+2 reg since I'm a table selecting nit, which (in my mind) widens your check-raising range on the turn. I also generally give people that buy in full a little more credit; as in, I assume they're going to be a little more aggressive than their short stacking counterparts. I had no reason to think you weren't good since it was just an accidental auto-post that got this hand started (although I often [probably unfairly] think, "this guy is a donk" when they defend the BB the first hand). But even still, against a random, the turn check-raise makes little sense. I feel like it's exactly two pair (where the second pair is a 5) or a cheap bluff attempt. I mean, certainly a flopped set of threes or KJ might check it twice, but that seems suicidal out of position on this particular flop and I generally think full buy in opponents 3bet KJ on the first hand.

Okay, this all kind of rambled a bit because I'm typing and playing the best thing ever, Super Turbos.

Basically, you don't know my range and that makes your play fairly kamikaze. I don't know your range, but it doesn't seem like it can be all that strong and even if it is; even against a set, I have decent equity.

All of that said, my preference is to play players that think five red cards beat a full house.

Good luck to everyone that plays today.

God I ****in love the regs thread.
I played I-b-O-k for the first time yesterday, I played rly bad but don't want to take anything away from him as he plays way better than his mega trolling would suggest.

Min raise button he gets all freaked out

LOL at Blackfruit join in my game saying guess I shoulda watched your video 1st, saying gl gl ect ect, then hes stuck and he starts talking **** ect ect

***** Hand History for Game 22435593254 *****
$200.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, November 28, 10:10:27 ET 2008
Table Esperanto II (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: blackfruit ( $204.00 USD )
Seat 2: lexirose23 ( $484.60 USD )
blackfruit posts small blind [$1.00 USD].
lexirose23 posts big blind [$2.00 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to lexirose23 [ 8s As ]
blackfruit raises [$5.00 USD]
lexirose23 calls [$4.00 USD]
** Dealing Flop ** [ Qc, 9c, Qh ]
lexirose23 checks
blackfruit bets [$8.00 USD]
lexirose23 calls [$8.00 USD]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 4c ]
lexirose23 checks
blackfruit checks
** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
lexirose23 bets [$20.00 USD]
blackfruit raises [$62.00 USD]
lexirose23 raises [$450.60 USD]
blackfruit " Slow playing fish"
blackfruit folds
lexirose23 wins $151.50 USD from main pot
lexirose23 shows [8s, As ]

haha nemo

lol <3 naismith.

i see the guy that threatened ur life from the live game hasn't succeeded yet.