Quote:
Originally Posted by chasern1
It's so frustrating that all other companies now think they have to copy every stupid move PS makes.
If you are of the view that removing HUNL is positive for the sites (increases net yield more than the reduction in revenue), then it's more that a move by Stars
allows them to do the same.
Those pushing the argument that there's an opportunity for a lesser site to "step up" ignore two things:
1. Stars spends the overwhelming majority of the industry's marketing dollars and the lesser sites get some benefit riding in the slipstream of that. So expect them all to start promoting lower edge gaming formats as well.
2. The ~3.4m active unique players of online poker per quarter is in slow decline, and Stars is focused on efforts to retain their share of them via formats they'll lose their money slower at (but Stars gets more of relative to regs). Any competitor site that resists that move is arguing that Stars marketing won't work and that it will be better for them to make less money per rec offering the old formats. If they do that and it doesn't work, Stars increases market share further.
I think there is some risk to the above-market rakeback some ipoker skins offer as well.
Last edited by risk2Dupside; 03-24-2016 at 06:46 PM.