Quote:
Originally Posted by YouSureSir
lol you take it so black and white kido. I said that it is very unlikely that sites are going to implement superusers. I never said colluding didn't happen or anything like that. I said that the sites are trying to stay within regulations on there own. Yes some make mistakes, but not purposefully like the previous guy suggested. Your the one to take it so extreme Anyways back to tax talk this does not need to continue in here,
just messing with ya/drunk trolling, sorry
here's a somewhat on topic question though - over/under on when something actually goes to court at a higher level a la Leblanc?
I know, I know - this is not the same as Leblanc... but that's the whole point really if Leblanc isn't adequate precedence.
I'm just wondering whether people think there might be a Leblanc equivalent, for poker specifically, on the horizon.