Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
When frequencies maybe neccesary but loose estimates lose vs regs not even thinking it. When frequencies maybe neccesary but loose estimates lose vs regs not even thinking it.

04-28-2024 , 11:17 PM
Not sure if this is the right place for this thread.

I had a question about how bad is it to get the wrong frequencies mostly postflop.

My understanding is that gto heuristics sometimes vary with dynamic range advantage/disadvantages considerations and the best thing you can do is assume how the frequencies vary with ranges. The other option would be to get alot of experience studying solves in how the ranges differ to memorize better frequencies. The latter to me is questionable in ability.

Because I just apply minimal heuristics and how it might vary I don't always use a rng. How bad is this in getting frequencies off when deviating from frequencies of heuristics and what would be the way to correct possibly losing money by having your approximations off by being exploitable. I think memorization is not something for me but then that would mean your off maybe sometimes even about 30%.

The reason why I ask is because I feel like I am playing games where frequencies are necessary but my loose estimates are actually losing me money against people that don't even think about frequencies.
When frequencies maybe neccesary but loose estimates lose vs regs not even thinking it. Quote
04-29-2024 , 01:45 PM
I also tend to play based upon the hand that I have a lot after getting at the betsize. Is that burning money.
When frequencies maybe neccesary but loose estimates lose vs regs not even thinking it. Quote

      
m