x-posting this from the NVG thread:
Here's the relevant text from 18 U.S.C. § 981(e) (6) Civil Forfeiture Act:
Quote:
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, except section 3 of the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Postal Service, as the case may be, is authorized to retain property forfeited pursuant to this section, or to transfer such property on such terms and conditions as he may determine
...
(6) as restoration to any victim of the offense giving rise to the forfeiture, including, in the case of a money laundering offense, any offense constituting the underlying specified unlawful activity; or
So isn't it the Attorney General Eric Holder and his office that ultimately decides?