yea the only reason I remembered it from before was that I was basically the only one who thought it should count, but most disagreed and the ruling was that it did not count
it is slightly different to be fair cuz in that case it was a side, so the person booking wrote down the same side as was on the list - in this case it happened to be a total with no vig, so it's less obvious that I only wanted under rather than just making a typo, but still the logic for that ruling would hold (my opinion)
discussion is around here:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...stcount=149185
also it's kind of easy to see why I made that mistake since it was a bunch of overs and only this one under he wanted, just in case anyone thinks it matters what my likely intent was
Last edited by bronbron006; 09-14-2017 at 11:44 AM.