Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Official pacific poker regulars thread Official pacific poker regulars thread

06-04-2010 , 06:55 PM
There should be always one free seat waiting for the most important person on pacific (wulfs) imo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortstackCat
uh no? I just downloaded luckyace again and its the same old ****

ty so much..now I need to re install my mods
You probably downloaded it from the Swedish LA page. Switch to English and try again.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-04-2010 , 10:02 PM
****ing ******s
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 04:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by koxx
There should be always one free seat waiting for the most important person on pacific (wulfs) imo.



You probably downloaded it from the Swedish LA page. Switch to English and try again.
I m still not sure what you guys mean..sure the old client is updated but I was talking about the brand new software..is that out?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 05:35 AM
no
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 05:41 AM
I'll upload it within two weeks.

Hello, everyone. I made the poker 6 client.

So, now you have a person to blame :-)

I'll try to answer for all "software" and "client behavior" questions.
And now the answers:

1. We are working to fix the HU games behavior.
2. we fixed the "7/6 players" on Short handed tables. It will be a part of poker 6 version.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 06:51 AM
Fold warning sound, please.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 07:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anti1k
Fold warning sound, please.
Nowadays, we have two sound indicators:
First, when it's your turn to act.
Second, 10 seconds before the end of the action time.

Is it not enough?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 08:17 AM
Speaking about regs... Anyone happens to know why is minderm playing nl50,nl100. He seemed like a solid reg...

Last edited by azoo; 06-05-2010 at 08:22 AM.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 08:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by volant
1. We are working to fix the HU games behavior.
How are you planning to solve the issue?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 10:16 AM
my betpot AHK just stopped working after getting the latest luckyace update..anyone got a working betpot maybe ?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by azoo
How are you planning to solve the issue?
I'll ask Yuv to post the solution .
It will be as if you can't be seated out.
You should play, or you will be kicked out from the table.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortstackCat
my betpot AHK just stopped working after getting the latest luckyace update..anyone got a working betpot maybe ?
mine does
maybe your account wants you to stop betting pot
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by volant
I'll upload it within two weeks.

Hello, everyone. I made the poker 6 client.

So, now you have a person to blame :-)

I'll try to answer for all "software" and "client behavior" questions.
And now the answers:

1. We are working to fix the HU games behavior.
2. we fixed the "7/6 players" on Short handed tables. It will be a part of poker 6 version.
seriously it's very simple to fix the hu games behavior, absolute and FTP fixed it, one table per player per stake, that's it. everything fixed, fair for everyone, won't have 35624576457 tables not running either
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nachunja
mine does
maybe your account wants you to stop betting pot
Haha, made my day
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
seriously it's very simple to fix the hu games behavior, absolute and FTP fixed it, one table per player per stake, that's it. everything fixed, fair for everyone, won't have 35624576457 tables not running either
This is a terrible system and does NOT generate action.

The only viable solution is a system where tables ONLY spawn when there is a designated number of other ones that are already running.

Ie. 100 regs cant sit out by themselves farming fish and not playing each other, this is not fair to the sites, since it generates them the least possible rake, considering they are the ones paying for advertising to get fish to come and play. It is also more fair for regs who actually want to play each other.

No more than say 6 1/2 tables at each stakes, and no more than 2 tables per limit. Once games are 2/2 obv it fills again up to that number.

Other important features as mentioned before, YOU MUST POST YOUR BLIND, and then it highcards for button randomly, so you cannot choose to only play your SB as a lot of douchebags on 888 choose to do, and then instant quit on their BB.

Some sort of hybrid model based on this system is better than anything on the internet currently, however this is vaguely similar to a partypoker system except with a cap of 1/2 tables in place.

10/20 (NL2000) on party is the best headsup system on the internet. There is only 3 tables at that stake and NO MORE can be filled. Thus it generates a huge war between regs to keep those tables and they actually play each other, and if they dont, they are forced to quit.

Unlike 888 where peoplelike "pokerraku" or "SOSOSOSOOS911" who are unable to beat regulars at NL200 can sit at NL5000 with only 20% of the buyin, and wait for fish to come.

End of story.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuroythmiX
This is a terrible system and does NOT generate action.

The only viable solution is a system where tables ONLY spawn when there is a designated number of other ones that are already running.

Ie. 100 regs cant sit out by themselves farming fish and not playing each other, this is not fair to the sites, since it generates them the least possible rake, considering they are the ones paying for advertising to get fish to come and play. It is also more fair for regs who actually want to play each other.

No more than say 6 1/2 tables at each stakes, and no more than 2 tables per limit. Once games are 2/2 obv it fills again up to that number.

Other important features as mentioned before, YOU MUST POST YOUR BLIND, and then it highcards for button randomly, so you cannot choose to only play your SB as a lot of douchebags on 888 choose to do, and then instant quit on their BB.

Some sort of hybrid model based on this system is better than anything on the internet currently, however this is vaguely similar to a partypoker system except with a cap of 1/2 tables in place.

10/20 (NL2000) on party is the best headsup system on the internet. There is only 3 tables at that stake and NO MORE can be filled. Thus it generates a huge war between regs to keep those tables and they actually play each other, and if they dont, they are forced to quit.

Unlike 888 where peoplelike "pokerraku" or "SOSOSOSOOS911" who are unable to beat regulars at NL200 can sit at NL5000 with only 20% of the buyin, and wait for fish to come.

End of story.
Absolutely agree with everything you said but I have been a regular at 888 for 4-5 years and have heard all this talk and suggestions before.
Nothing was done about it then and I have no faith anything will be done about it now, which is a shame.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 03:14 PM
deep tables with antes please
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 03:25 PM
The HU solution that we're working on will not be of the FTP-type, but similar to what Auro wrote. "Must-play" tables with limited amount of tables opened in each stake.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 04:51 PM
heads up is fine dont change it noob cakes how about just put some money into marketing and get ppl to come play instead of crying all day
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 07:30 PM
Don't limit the hu tables to just 1 per stake and is there any hope for timebank?

Edit: btw the new sound sucks imo

Last edited by silver18; 06-05-2010 at 07:36 PM.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 09:31 PM
Why would you not want to limit hu tables to one per stake? You must be one of those guys that open 10 tables just to get action faster than other regs. Timebank is also a bad idea imo.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-05-2010 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuv
The HU solution that we're working on will not be of the FTP-type, but similar to what Auro wrote. "Must-play" tables with limited amount of tables opened in each stake.
why not go for fulltilt system? 1 table per player per limit looks pretty neat.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-06-2010 , 03:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyfishZ
why not go for fulltilt system? 1 table per player per limit looks pretty neat.
Omg just read what AuroythmiX just wrote, dont pretend to be more stupid than you are. AuroythmiX has the ultimate answer period.

Btw software developer, how long time is it till its released?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-06-2010 , 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammeren
Omg just read what AuroythmiX just wrote, dont pretend to be more stupid than you are. AuroythmiX has the ultimate answer period.

Btw software developer, how long time is it till its released?
within two weeks.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
06-06-2010 , 04:05 AM
if yayfor16 fell down a well and i was the only townsfolk with a ladder or rope i would refuse to help. that is all
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote

      
m