Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Official pacific poker regulars thread Official pacific poker regulars thread

03-08-2009 , 04:24 PM
What the hell is this "An invalid argument was encountered" everytime I open the lobby?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 07:43 PM
I understand the need for mitigating fraudulent activity, but having to wait 3 days before a cashout is reviewed is a joke.

Let's keep up with the times, and at least bring this time frame from 3 days down to 1 (even 2 days would be appreciated).

Yuv, any comments on this policy?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by July1999
"An invalid argument was encountered"
Invalid argument = "I play on Pacific because the software is awesome!'
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 08:21 PM
Even a tiny network has a software that doesn't crash. Where do all those 4 dollar rakes go ? I mean , they made some improvement over the past months, but why don't they just make a totally new software? With all the money they are making, it shouldn't be too difficult to make a good software .. They make like millions per months and can't afford to spend like 100k on a software?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 09:08 PM
I find Pacifics software one of the better ones out there actually. Top 5 even. If there were no crashes (and I have none) then it would be maybe even top4 or 3. And I am serious.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 09:14 PM
The software has only crashed once for me in the last few weeks, it's really quite solid now on my pc. (fwiw I'm on XP)

I like the pot buttons too. Improvements so far are good.

Any chance of having an option for disabling pop ups? The $50 refer a friend one is on all the time. Prob others feel the same.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBarracuda
I find Pacifics software one of the better ones out there actually. Top 5 even. If there were no crashes (and I have none) then it would be maybe even top4 or 3. And I am serious.
you gotta be kidding me dude.. Pacific is by far the worst. Have you even played at Stars or Ladbrokes? It's like playing in heaven compared to Pacific.
And it's a joke that there are frequently over thousand dollar pots at Pacific and the software can crash.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-08-2009 , 10:13 PM
I have a temporary, cheap solution.

PLEASE ALLOW MORE TIME FOR CRAHSED OR DISCONNECTED PLAYER TO COME BACK !!

JUST EXTRA 30 SECONDS ALL WE NEED !!

Other players can wait and honestly it doesn't cost that much to Pacific in terms of rake.

On other sites I played at, even if i got disconnected I was still be able to come back a large portion of time. But at pacific I lost my hand 100 % of time everytime I get disconnected. I was so ****ing mad when a fish min raise on the turn agiant my full house and I get disconnected just before clicking all in.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 02:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorgo
I understand the need for mitigating fraudulent activity, but having to wait 3 days before a cashout is reviewed is a joke.

Let's keep up with the times, and at least bring this time frame from 3 days down to 1 (even 2 days would be appreciated).

Yuv, any comments on this policy?
It's been reviewed (I know a lot of the stuff I say can be just waived off as PR stuff, but I was actually in that meeting).

I will check where this stand today and try to give you guys a better answer.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 04:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyfishZ
you gotta be kidding me dude.. Pacific is by far the worst. Have you even played at Stars or Ladbrokes? It's like playing in heaven compared to Pacific.
And it's a joke that there are frequently over thousand dollar pots at Pacific and the software can crash.
i actually agree w/red and fwiw stars software tilts me lol, i know i know, its renowned for being good /flame away.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 06:21 AM
lol I don't understand how you cannot like stars software, it's just so good. Their software is actually part of the reasons why they are so successful.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 06:36 AM
yeah i know, like 99% of ppl like it. ive played >99% of my hands on pp tho, so i guess im just used to it and anything else tilts me.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBarracuda
I find Pacifics software one of the better ones out there actually. Top 5 even. If there were no crashes (and I have none) then it would be maybe even top4 or 3. And I am serious.
I'd really like to hear your list of sites ranked by software
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 03:29 PM
Biggest luckbox on 888 is luckysmy, this guy is unbelievable.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by July1999
Biggest luckbox on 888 is luckysmy, this guy is unbelievable.
I actually have him running at 11 BBs over 5k hands and I still can't figure out if he is just the luckiest player alive or just owns my soul every time.

I'm not sure how he can have those results with his status though. they look really fishy
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by July1999
Biggest luckbox on 888 is luckysmy, this guy is unbelievable.
I wouldn't mind playing him HU 4 rollz, even completly stoned.

This guy doesn't understand the game and thats why hell go broke in no time.. I staked him many times already.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 04:57 PM
And thank you to all my fans~
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 07:30 PM
Hey guys ,

Do u know if we can mod the luckyace poker things ?? i mean mod the decks and background.


Thanks


U guys at NL400 sucks; I Own you !! (except wulfs ... )
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuckDude
I wouldn't mind playing him HU 4 rollz, even completly stoned.

This guy doesn't understand the game and thats why hell go broke in no time.. I staked him many times already.
I bet is very +EV to stake a person that doesn't understand the game
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raze
I'd really like to hear your list of sites ranked by software
stars
tilt
party
pacific

not necessary in that order for the first three, but you get my point.. Other rooms I played at I rate pacific's software better looking (especially with the ease it can be modded) and solid overall.. Part of the reason obv is that I play there a bunch and am used to it, but after pacific I played cake,absolut,ipoker,ongame,paradise and a couple of other rooms, and not one comes close to pacific in respect to software (for me)..

EDIT: also, I would like to say that I think Rosspier improved a bunch..

Last edited by RedBarracuda; 03-09-2009 at 08:07 PM. Reason: forgot something
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 08:04 PM
ever heard of the newbie luck ? ? ? ?

meant stacked obv : ]
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-09-2009 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBarracuda
stars
tilt
party
pacific

not necessary in that order for the first three, but you get my point.. Other rooms I played at I rate pacific's software better looking (especially with the ease it can be modded) and solid overall.. Part of the reason obv is that I play there a bunch and am used to it, but after pacific I played cake,absolut,ipoker,ongame,paradise and a couple of other rooms, and not one comes close to pacific in respect to software (for me)..

EDIT: also, I would like to say that I think Rosspier improved a bunch..
Good stuff. I personally love iPoker software, especially multi-tabling the mini view. I take Pac over ongame as well.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-10-2009 , 06:36 AM
luckysmy... Is a lucky danish follow !
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-10-2009 , 06:38 AM
MuckDude, I might be your greatest fan!
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
03-10-2009 , 11:56 AM
can someone check the hand history (a couple of them) made by the handgrabber for me please?

the thing is, i don't see the "DEALT TO HERO" part that is supposed to come before flop.. can someone verify this?

look

***** Pacific Hand History for Game ......*****
$1/$2 Blinds No Limit Hold'em - *** 03 10 16:48:47 2009
Table Oaxaca (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: Redbarracuda ( $509.25 )
Seat 2: gagges ( $206.53 )
Seat 7: DrikusQ ( $38 )
Seat 8: OhMeGlassEye ( $414.2 )
Seat 10: clwfac ( $507.51 )
DrikusQ posts small blind [$1].
OhMeGlassEye posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
clwfac folds.
Redbarracuda raises [$7].
gagges folds.
DrikusQ folds.
OhMeGlassEye calls [$5].
** Dealing Flop ** [ Kh, Kc, Js ]
OhMeGlassEye checks.
Redbarracuda checks.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 2c ]
OhMeGlassEye bets [$12].
Redbarracuda folds.
** Summary **
OhMeGlassEye collected [$26.25].
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote

      
m